Mark F. Walker
Impact in
- Neurology top 1%
- Vestibular and auditory disorders
- Sensory Systems top 5%
- Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics
Papers in
- Neurology 35
- Vestibular and auditory disorders 34
-
- Ophthalmology and Eye Disorders 23
- Co-authors
- David S. Zee (18 shared papers)Michael E. Goldberg (1 shared paper)E. J. Fitzgibbon (1 shared paper)Ke Liao (10 shared papers)Anand C. Joshi (8 shared papers)Jing Tian (6 shared papers)Richard Leigh (8 shared papers)Michael Strupp (4 shared papers)
- Journals
- Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences (9 papers)Neurology (6 papers)Journal of Neurophysiology (6 papers)Progress in brain research (5 papers)Vision Research (3 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesItalyGermany
In The Last Decade
Mark F. Walker
48 papers receiving 1.2k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 76
- Neurology 582
- Sensory Systems 115
- Cognitive Neuroscience 398
- Ophthalmology 166
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine 289
Countries citing papers authored by Mark F. Walker
This map shows the geographic impact of Mark F. Walker's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark F. Walker with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark F. Walker more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Mark F. Walker
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark F. Walker. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark F. Walker. The network helps show where Mark F. Walker may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Mark F. Walker, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 48 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1995 | 287 | |
| 2 | 2017 | 92 | |
| 3 | 2013 | 67 | |
| 4 | 2011 | 65 | |
| 5 | 1999 | 61 | |
| 6 | 2005 | 46 | |
| 7 | 2008 | 43 | |
| 8 | 2007 | 36 | |
| 9 | 2008 | 34 | |
| 10 | 1999 | 34 | |
| 11 | 2010 | 29 | |
| 12 | 2008 | 28 | |
| 13 | 2005 | 26 | |
| 14 | 2003 | 26 | |
| 15 | 2015 | 25 | |
| 16 | 2002 | 23 | |
| 17 | 2003 | 22 | |
| 18 | 2015 | 21 | |
| 19 | 2008 | 20 | |
| 20 | 2000 | 20 |
About Mark F. Walker
Mark F. Walker is a scholar working on Neurology, Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Ophthalmology, Cognitive Neuroscience and Neurology, having authored 48 papers that have together received 1.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Vestibular and auditory disorders (34 papers), Ophthalmology and Eye Disorders (23 papers), Glaucoma and retinal disorders (13 papers), Visual perception and processing mechanisms (8 papers), Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics (5 papers), Traumatic Brain Injury Research (3 papers), Ocular Surface and Contact Lens (3 papers) and Balance, Gait, and Falls Prevention (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Neurology (582 citations), Sensory Systems (115 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (398 citations), Ophthalmology (166 citations) and Pathology and Forensic Medicine (289 citations). Mark F. Walker has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Italy and Germany. Frequent co-authors include David S. Zee, Michael E. Goldberg, E. J. Fitzgibbon, Ke Liao, Anand C. Joshi, Jing Tian, Richard Leigh, Michael Strupp, Rafael J. Tamargo and Howard S. Ying. Their work appears in journals such as Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, Neurology, Journal of Neurophysiology, Progress in brain research and Vision Research.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.