Mark E. Schroeder

28 papers receiving 930 citations

Peers

Mark E. Schroeder
Comparison fields: 5 of 102
  • Insect Science 429
  • Medical Laboratory Technology 39
  • Emergency Medical Services 65
  • Parasitology 62
  • Plant Science 181
Replace Gianni Mistrello with:
Gianni Mistrello Italy
M. Henry United States
Hee‐Sook Kim United States
Ambroise Martin France
V. Vijayasekaran India
Jie Cao China
Fanuel Lampiao Malawi
Paulo Roberto da Silva Brazil
S. Cifelli United States
Michela Pugliese Italy
Mark E. Schroeder relative to Gianni Mistrello Italy Gianni Mistrello's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×20×30×39×
Gianni Mistrello · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mark E. Schroeder

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mark E. Schroeder's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark E. Schroeder with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark E. Schroeder more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mark E. Schroeder

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark E. Schroeder. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark E. Schroeder. The network helps show where Mark E. Schroeder may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Mark E. Schroeder, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Mark E. Schroeder Line = papers co-authored together Mark E. Schroeder links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 31 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2014148
2 1984113
3 2006113
4 2016111
5
Diagnosis and treatment of genitofemoral and ilioinguinal entrapment neuralgia.
198798
6 201367
7 197363
8 199948
9 201539
10 198833
11 197723
12 197021
13 200919
14 198719
15 199519
16 200417
17
Reversal of cytochrome P-4501A1 and P-450-EF expression in MCA-C3H/10T1/2 cell-derived tumors as compared to cultured cells.
199313
18 19867
19
A Membrane Structure for a Lunar Assembly Building
19946
20 20086

About Mark E. Schroeder

Mark E. Schroeder is a scholar working on Insect Science, Surgery, Plant Science, Pharmacology and History, having authored 31 papers that have together received 998 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Insect and Pesticide Research (7 papers), Medical History and Innovations (4 papers), Anesthesia and Pain Management (4 papers), Patient Safety and Medication Errors (3 papers), Cholinesterase and Neurodegenerative Diseases (3 papers), Insect Pest Control Strategies (3 papers), Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research (3 papers) and Pain Management and Opioid Use (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Insect Science (429 citations), Medical Laboratory Technology (39 citations), Emergency Medical Services (65 citations), Parasitology (62 citations) and Plant Science (181 citations). Mark E. Schroeder has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include D. L. Shankland, Bruce A. Harms, James R. Starling, Eric A. Benner, Daniel Cordova, C. W. Holyoke, Thomas F. Pahutski, Tosha B. Wetterneck, Pascale Carayon and George P. Lahm. Their work appears in journals such as Pesticide Biochemistry and Physiology, Anesthesiology, Journal of Economic Entomology, Journal of Insect Physiology and Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry Letters.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact