Mark E. Holey

30 papers receiving 921 citations

Peers

Mark E. Holey
Comparison fields: 5 of 63
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 860
  • Aquatic Science 320
  • Ecology 548
  • Global and Planetary Change 313
  • Environmental Chemistry 78
Replace David F. Clapp with:
David F. Clapp United States
Michael A. McClelland United States
Thomas P. Poe United States
J. Jeffery Isely United States
Jean‐François Rubin Switzerland
John J. Ney United States
Fred P. Binkowski United States
Ronald J. Klauda United States
Clifford P. Schneider United States
Edmundo Díaz‐Pardo Mexico
Mark E. Holey relative to David F. Clapp United States David F. Clapp's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2×
David F. Clapp · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mark E. Holey

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mark E. Holey's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark E. Holey with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark E. Holey more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mark E. Holey

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark E. Holey. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark E. Holey. The network helps show where Mark E. Holey may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Mark E. Holey, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Mark E. Holey Line = papers co-authored together Mark E. Holey links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 31 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1987159
2 1995131
3 2005109
4 200773
5 199855
6 200249
7
FISH-COMMUNITY OBJECTIVES FOR LAKE MICHIGAN
199549
8 199244
9 198740
10 199537
11 201334
12 199732
13 199831
14 197931
15 199520
16 201920
17 200017
18 202117
19 200416
20 201816

About Mark E. Holey

Mark E. Holey is a scholar working on Nature and Landscape Conservation, Aquatic Science, Ecology, Global and Planetary Change and Water Science and Technology, having authored 31 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Fish Ecology and Management Studies (27 papers), Aquatic Invertebrate Ecology and Behavior (13 papers), Marine and fisheries research (10 papers), Fish Biology and Ecology Studies (9 papers), Wildlife Ecology and Conservation (3 papers), Genetic diversity and population structure (3 papers), Isotope Analysis in Ecology (2 papers) and Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestock (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Nature and Landscape Conservation (860 citations), Aquatic Science (320 citations), Ecology (548 citations), Global and Planetary Change (313 citations) and Environmental Chemistry (78 citations). Mark E. Holey has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Canada. Frequent co-authors include James A. Rice, Larry B. Crowder, Michael L. Toneys, Edward H. Brown, Michael A. Miller, Charles R. Bronte, Michael J. Hansen, Randy L. Eshenroder, Dennis S. Lavis and Gary W. Eck. Their work appears in journals such as North American Journal of Fisheries Management, Journal of Great Lakes Research, Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, Journal of Aquatic Animal Health and Transactions of the American Fisheries Society.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact