Mark E. Hepworth

1.9k citations
83 papers · 1.4k · h-index 23

Impact in

Papers in

Mark E. Hepworth

77 papers receiving 1.2k citations

Peers

Mark E. Hepworth
Comparison fields: 5 of 113
  • Library and Information Sciences 353
  • Urban Studies 251
  • Communication 148
  • Media Technology 144
  • Information Systems 287
Replace Helen S. Du with:
Helen S. Du China
Michael B. Gurstein Canada
James Cornford United Kingdom
Ana Cristina Vasconcelos United Kingdom
Antonio Díaz Andrade New Zealand
Michael W. Norris United Kingdom
Rowena J. Cullen New Zealand
Roberta Lamb United States
Bruce R. Kingma United States
Andrew Massey United Kingdom
Mark E. Hepworth relative to Helen S. Du China Helen S. Du's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5×12×
Helen S. Du · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mark E. Hepworth

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mark E. Hepworth's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark E. Hepworth with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark E. Hepworth more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mark E. Hepworth

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark E. Hepworth. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark E. Hepworth. The network helps show where Mark E. Hepworth may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Mark E. Hepworth, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Mark E. Hepworth Line = papers co-authored together Mark E. Hepworth links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 83 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1990126
2 201177
3 198674
4 198772
5 200962
6 201657
7 198851
8 200248
9 200745
10 199044
11 200043
12 200438
13 200837
14 200436
15 198836
16 201232
17 198732
18 201231
19
A Study of Undergraduate Information Literacy and Skills: The Inclusion of Information Literacy and Skills in the Undergraduate Curriculum.
199929
20 198729

About Mark E. Hepworth

Mark E. Hepworth is a scholar working on Library and Information Sciences, Information Systems, Urban Studies, Media Technology and Education, having authored 83 papers that have together received 1.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Library Science and Information Literacy (27 papers), Library Science and Administration (11 papers), Online and Blended Learning (10 papers), Global Urban Networks and Dynamics (9 papers), Web and Library Services (8 papers), ICT Impact and Policies (7 papers), Knowledge Management and Sharing (6 papers) and Regional Development and Policy (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Library and Information Sciences (353 citations), Urban Studies (251 citations), Communication (148 citations), Media Technology (144 citations) and Information Systems (287 citations). Mark E. Hepworth has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, India and Kuwait. Frequent co-authors include Geoff Walton, Kevin Robins, Gillian Ragsdell, Anne E Green, Ian Murray, Donald G. Janelle, Nicole Ellen James, Michael Waterson, Sally E. Maynard and Hugh E. Williams. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Librarianship and Information Science, Aslib Journal of Information Management, Journal of Documentation, Journal of Information Literacy and Cities.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact