Mark E. Button

513 citations
14 papers · 239 · h-index 7

Impact in

Papers in

Mark E. Button

14 papers receiving 199 citations

Peers

Mark E. Button
Comparison fields: 5 of 59
  • Communication 80
  • Public Administration 34
  • Political Science and International Relations 100
  • Philosophy 27
  • General Decision Sciences 4
Replace Sean Phelan with:
Sean Phelan New Zealand
Matthew T. Witt United States
Sean Chabot United States
Robert J. Spitzer United States
Richard Sobel France
Lyndi Hewitt United States
Chip Berlet Ireland
Anne Norton United States
Sally Young Australia
Barbara Fultner United States
Mark E. Button relative to Sean Phelan New Zealand Sean Phelan's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.1×
Sean Phelan · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mark E. Button

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mark E. Button's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark E. Button with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark E. Button more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mark E. Button

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark E. Button. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark E. Button. The network helps show where Mark E. Button may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 2 scholars most cited alongside Mark E. Button, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Mark E. Button Line = papers co-authored together Mark E. Button links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

14 of 14 papers shown
#Work
1 1999121
2 200534
3 201621
4 201815
5 201611
6 20169
7
The financial cost of UK public sector fraud: a less painful way to reduce public expenditure
20107
8 20115
9 20055
10 20083
11 20083
12 20143
13 20181
14 20111

About Mark E. Button

Mark E. Button is a scholar working on Political Science and International Relations, Sociology and Political Science, Communication, Social Psychology and General Health Professions, having authored 14 papers that have together received 239 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Critical Theory and Philosophy (3 papers), Social Media and Politics (2 papers), Torture, Ethics, and Law (2 papers), Political Philosophy and Ethics (2 papers), Hannah Arendt's Political Philosophy (2 papers), Pragmatism in Philosophy and Education (1 paper), Social and Cultural Dynamics (1 paper) and Homicide, Infanticide, and Child Abuse (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Communication (80 citations), Public Administration (34 citations), Political Science and International Relations (100 citations), Philosophy (27 citations) and General Decision Sciences (4 citations). Mark E. Button has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Kevin Mattson and Graham Brooks. Their work appears in journals such as Political Theory, Political Studies, Law Culture and the Humanities, Perspectives on Politics and Political Research Quarterly.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact