Mark E. Button

520 citations
20 papers · 275 · h-index 7

Impact in

Papers in

Mark E. Button

17 papers receiving 226 citations

Peers

Mark E. Button
Comparison fields: 5 of 63
  • Communication 88
  • Public Administration 35
  • Political Science and International Relations 112
  • Philosophy 30
  • Sociology and Political Science 100
Replace Matthew T. Witt with:
Matthew T. Witt United States
Robert J. Spitzer United States
Richard Sobel France
Sally Young Australia
John A. Noakes United States
Lyndi Hewitt United States
David A. Hoekema United States
Allan Patience Australia
Chip Berlet United States
Michael Farrelly United Kingdom
Mark E. Button relative to Matthew T. Witt United States Matthew T. Witt's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.2×
Matthew T. Witt · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mark E. Button

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mark E. Button's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark E. Button with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark E. Button more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mark E. Button

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark E. Button. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark E. Button. The network helps show where Mark E. Button may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 2 scholars most cited alongside Mark E. Button, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Mark E. Button Line = papers co-authored together Mark E. Button links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 1999129
2 200542
3 201626
4 201816
5 201612
6 201611
7
The financial cost of UK public sector fraud: a less painful way to reduce public expenditure
20109
8 20116
9 20085
10 20055
11 20144
12 20083
13 20192
14 20111
15 20181
16 20171
17 20151
18 20161
19 20060
20 20190

About Mark E. Button

Mark E. Button is a scholar working on Political Science and International Relations, Sociology and Political Science, Social Psychology, Communication and General Health Professions, having authored 20 papers that have together received 275 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Critical Theory and Philosophy (3 papers), Torture, Ethics, and Law (2 papers), Political Philosophy and Ethics (2 papers), Suicide and Self-Harm Studies (2 papers), Religion, Society, and Development (2 papers), American Constitutional Law and Politics (2 papers), Social Media and Politics (2 papers) and Hannah Arendt's Political Philosophy (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Communication (88 citations), Public Administration (35 citations), Political Science and International Relations (112 citations), Philosophy (30 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (100 citations). Mark E. Button has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Kevin Mattson and Graham Brooks. Their work appears in journals such as Political Theory, Perspectives on Politics, Journal of the European Pentecostal Theological Association, Political Research Quarterly and Law Culture and the Humanities.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact