Mark E. Borrello
Impact in
-
- Philosophy and History of Science
- Genetics top 10%
- Evolution and Genetic Dynamics
Papers in
-
- Philosophy and History of Science 9
- History of Science and Natural History 2
- Evolution and Science Education 1
- History of Science and Medicine 1
- Genetics 3
- Evolution and Genetic Dynamics 3
- Co-authors
- Robert Ford Denison (1 shared paper)Michael Travisano (1 shared paper)William C. Ratcliff (1 shared paper)Marlene Zuk (1 shared paper)Thomas Suddendorf (1 shared paper)Colin Allen (1 shared paper)Michael R Dietrich (1 shared paper)Gregory Radick (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (1 paper)Biology Letters (1 paper)Journal of the History of Biology (1 paper)Perspectives in biology and medicine (1 paper)Metascience (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesIsraelAustralia
In The Last Decade
Mark E. Borrello
11 papers receiving 455 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 65
- History and Philosophy of Science 99
- Genetics 239
- Aging 5
- Molecular Biology 123
- Sociology and Political Science 79
Countries citing papers authored by Mark E. Borrello
This map shows the geographic impact of Mark E. Borrello's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark E. Borrello with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark E. Borrello more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Mark E. Borrello
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark E. Borrello. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark E. Borrello. The network helps show where Mark E. Borrello may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 8 scholars most cited alongside Mark E. Borrello, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2012 | 375 | |
| 2 | 2005 | 43 | |
| 3 | 2010 | 34 | |
| 4 | 2003 | 13 | |
| 5 | 2004 | 4 | |
| 6 | Shifting balance and balancing selection: A group selectionist's interpretation of Wright and Dobzhansky | 2009 | 3 |
| 7 | 2009 | 2 | |
| 8 | 2013 | 2 | |
| 9 | The farmer, the hunter, and the census taker: three distinct views of animal behavior. | 2010 | 1 |
| 10 | 2011 | 1 | |
| 11 | 2017 | 1 | |
| 12 | 2021 | 0 |
About Mark E. Borrello
Mark E. Borrello is a scholar working on History and Philosophy of Science, Genetics, General Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, having authored 12 papers that have together received 479 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Philosophy and History of Science (9 papers), Evolution and Genetic Dynamics (3 papers), History of Science and Natural History (2 papers), Evolutionary Game Theory and Cooperation (2 papers), Academic and Historical Perspectives in Psychology (1 paper), Evolution and Science Education (1 paper), History of Science and Medicine (1 paper) and Animal Behavior and Reproduction (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in History and Philosophy of Science (99 citations), Genetics (239 citations), Aging (5 citations), Molecular Biology (123 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (79 citations). Mark E. Borrello has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Israel and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Robert Ford Denison, Michael Travisano, William C. Ratcliff, Marlene Zuk, Thomas Suddendorf, Colin Allen, Michael R Dietrich and Gregory Radick. Their work appears in journals such as Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Biology Letters, Journal of the History of Biology, Perspectives in biology and medicine and Metascience.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.