Mark Donohue

5.0k citations
98 papers · 1.6k · h-index 18

Impact in

Papers in

Mark Donohue

87 papers receiving 1.3k citations

Peers

Mark Donohue
Comparison fields: 5 of 97
  • Linguistics and Language 537
  • Geography, Planning and Development 317
  • Language and Linguistics 561
  • Cultural Studies 212
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 291
Replace Cecil H. Brown with:
Cecil H. Brown United States
Søren Wichmann Germany
Robert Blust United States
Claire Bowern United States
Andrew Pawley Australia
Patrick McConvell Australia
Laurent Sagart France
Fiona M. Jordan United Kingdom
Terrence Kaufman United States
Niclas Burenhult Netherlands
Mark Donohue relative to Cecil H. Brown United States Cecil H. Brown's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.0×
Cecil H. Brown · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mark Donohue

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mark Donohue's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark Donohue with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark Donohue more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mark Donohue

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark Donohue. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark Donohue. The network helps show where Mark Donohue may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Mark Donohue, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Mark Donohue Line = papers co-authored together Mark Donohue links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 98 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2011320
2 2020119
3 2010109
4 2011107
5 199968
6 200851
7 200948
8 200839
9 200935
10 199732
11 201432
12 201127
13 200926
14 200725
15 201521
16 200420
17 200718
18 201117
19 199616
20 200516

About Mark Donohue

Mark Donohue is a scholar working on Linguistics and Language, Language and Linguistics, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Cultural Studies and Geography, Planning and Development, having authored 98 papers that have together received 1.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Linguistic Variation and Morphology (62 papers), Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation (42 papers), Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies (28 papers), Multilingual Education and Policy (17 papers), Phonetics and Phonology Research (16 papers), Pacific and Southeast Asian Studies (14 papers), Language and cultural evolution (14 papers) and Australian Indigenous Culture and History (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Linguistics and Language (537 citations), Geography, Planning and Development (317 citations), Language and Linguistics (561 citations), Cultural Studies (212 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (291 citations). Mark Donohue has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, Singapore and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Tim Denham, Janet Fletcher, Brett Baker, Søren Wichmann, Edmond De Langhe, Xavier Perrier, Charles E. Grimes, Françoise Carreel, Vincent Lebot and Carol Lentfer. Their work appears in journals such as Oceanic Linguistics, Linguistic Typology, Studies in Language, Australian Journal of Linguistics and Language.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact