Mark Difford
Impact in
-
- Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies
- Global and Planetary Change top 10%
- Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management
- Land Use and Ecosystem Services
- Forest Management and Policy
Papers in
-
- Land Use and Ecosystem Services 4
- Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management 3
-
- Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies 6
- Co-authors
- Richard M. Cowling (12 shared papers)Andrew T. Knight (2 shared papers)Bruce Campbell (1 shared paper)Anthony Mills (2 shared papers)Curtis W. Marean (4 shared papers)Eileen E. Campbell (2 shared papers)Tineke Kraaij (2 shared papers)François Engelbrecht (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Quaternary Science Reviews (3 papers)PeerJ (3 papers)Waste Management (2 papers)Conservation Biology (1 paper)Applied Vegetation Science (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- South AfricaUnited StatesAustralia
In The Last Decade
Mark Difford
16 papers receiving 401 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 62
- Nature and Landscape Conservation 111
- Global and Planetary Change 191
- Ecological Modeling 36
- Archeology 8
- Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law 79
Countries citing papers authored by Mark Difford
This map shows the geographic impact of Mark Difford's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark Difford with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark Difford more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Mark Difford
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark Difford. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark Difford. The network helps show where Mark Difford may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Mark Difford, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2010 | 174 | |
| 2 | 2019 | 62 | |
| 3 | 2013 | 34 | |
| 4 | 2014 | 25 | |
| 5 | 2020 | 18 | |
| 6 | 2011 | 16 | |
| 7 | 2013 | 16 | |
| 8 | 2020 | 14 | |
| 9 | 2019 | 11 | |
| 10 | 2009 | 9 | |
| 11 | 2012 | 6 | |
| 12 | 2017 | 6 | |
| 13 | 2021 | 5 | |
| 14 | 2012 | 4 | |
| 15 | 2019 | 4 | |
| 16 | 2023 | 3 |
About Mark Difford
Mark Difford is a scholar working on Global and Planetary Change, Nature and Landscape Conservation, Ecology, Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law and Anthropology, having authored 16 papers that have together received 407 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (6 papers), Land Use and Ecosystem Services (4 papers), Pleistocene-Era Hominins and Archaeology (4 papers), Environmental Education and Sustainability (4 papers), Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management (3 papers), Municipal Solid Waste Management (2 papers), Archaeology and ancient environmental studies (2 papers) and Geology and Paleoclimatology Research (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Nature and Landscape Conservation (111 citations), Global and Planetary Change (191 citations), Ecological Modeling (36 citations), Archeology (8 citations) and Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law (79 citations). Mark Difford has collaborated with scholars based in South Africa, United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Richard M. Cowling, Andrew T. Knight, Bruce Campbell, Anthony Mills, Curtis W. Marean, Eileen E. Campbell, Tineke Kraaij, François Engelbrecht, Eric Shook and Louis Scott. Their work appears in journals such as Quaternary Science Reviews, PeerJ, Waste Management, Conservation Biology and Applied Vegetation Science.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.