Mark Dennis

1.6k citations
55 papers · 958 · h-index 16

Impact in

Papers in

Mark Dennis

49 papers receiving 949 citations

Peers

Mark Dennis
Comparison fields: 5 of 69
  • Emergency Medicine 481
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 280
  • Biomedical Engineering 525
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine 51
  • Surgery 436
Replace Lindsay M. Ryerson with:
Lindsay M. Ryerson Canada
Lucia S.D. Jewbali Netherlands
Nadia Aïssaoui France
Pranathi R. Sundaragiri United States
Maik Foltan Germany
Pierre Demondion France
Robert A. Niebler United States
Melvin C. Almodovar United States
Johannes Kalbhenn Germany
Katsuhide Maeda United States
Mark Dennis relative to Lindsay M. Ryerson Canada Lindsay M. Ryerson's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.9×
Lindsay M. Ryerson · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mark Dennis

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mark Dennis's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark Dennis with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark Dennis more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mark Dennis

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark Dennis. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark Dennis. The network helps show where Mark Dennis may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Mark Dennis, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Mark Dennis Line = papers co-authored together Mark Dennis links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 55 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2018140
2 2017111
3 201678
4 200464
5 201963
6 201956
7 202150
8 201746
9 202044
10 201336
11 202034
12 201724
13 202223
14 202218
15 201515
16 201815
17 201812
18 202210
19 20239
20 20138

About Mark Dennis

Mark Dennis is a scholar working on Biomedical Engineering, Emergency Medicine, Surgery, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine and Epidemiology, having authored 55 papers that have together received 958 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices (38 papers), Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation (35 papers), Cardiac Structural Anomalies and Repair (22 papers), Trauma and Emergency Care Studies (6 papers), Congenital Heart Disease Studies (5 papers), Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes (4 papers), Trauma Management and Diagnosis (4 papers) and Heart Failure Treatment and Management (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Emergency Medicine (481 citations), Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (280 citations), Biomedical Engineering (525 citations), Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine (51 citations) and Surgery (436 citations). Mark Dennis has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Paul Forrest, David S. Celermajer, Brian Burns, Rachael Cordina, Claudio Sandroni, David Gattas, Richard Totaro, Sean Scott, Massimo Antonelli and Sonia D’Arrigo. Their work appears in journals such as Resuscitation, Scandinavian Journal of Trauma Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine, Scientific Reports, International Journal of Cardiology and Critical Care Medicine.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact