Mark Denbow

1.2k citations
27 papers · 744 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

Mark Denbow

23 papers receiving 694 citations

Peers

Mark Denbow
Comparison fields: 5 of 68
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 249
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 599
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 69
  • Biomaterials 21
  • Surgery 50
Replace Jonathan T. McGuane with:
Jonathan T. McGuane Australia
F. Montoya Spain
Manvinder Singh United States
Mary South United States
O. P. Mishra India
Michael Scholtes Germany
Harish Chandran United Kingdom
Francesca Rizzello Italy
Prasad Palani Velu United Kingdom
K Bettahar-Lebugle France
Mark Denbow relative to Jonathan T. McGuane Australia Jonathan T. McGuane's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×6×8×9.4×
Jonathan T. McGuane · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mark Denbow

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mark Denbow's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark Denbow with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark Denbow more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mark Denbow

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark Denbow. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark Denbow. The network helps show where Mark Denbow may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Mark Denbow, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Mark Denbow Line = papers co-authored together Mark Denbow links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 27 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2000366
2 1998100
3 199855
4 200937
5 200036
6 201722
7 200922
8 199819
9 199715
10 200512
11 200811
12 20139
13 19986
14 20065
15 20055
16 19975
17 20044
18 19964
19 20093
20 19983

About Mark Denbow

Mark Denbow is a scholar working on Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Obstetrics and Gynecology, Surgery, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, having authored 27 papers that have together received 744 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Assisted Reproductive Technology and Twin Pregnancy (14 papers), Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics (10 papers), Pregnancy and preeclampsia studies (7 papers), Fetal and Pediatric Neurological Disorders (2 papers), Ectopic Pregnancy Diagnosis and Management (2 papers), Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernia Studies (2 papers), Spinal Dysraphism and Malformations (1 paper) and Polymer Surface Interaction Studies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Obstetrics and Gynecology (249 citations), Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (599 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (69 citations), Biomaterials (21 citations) and Surgery (50 citations). Mark Denbow has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Italy and Chile. Frequent co-authors include Nicholas M. Fisk, Myles Taylor, Donna M. Hammal, D.G. Talbert, P. Cox, Phillipa M. Kyle, Roberto Fogliani, Yuan Wang, Umberto Nicolini and Terence Cosgrove. Their work appears in journals such as Fetal Diagnosis and Therapy, Prenatal Diagnosis, BJOG An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Current Opinion in Obstetrics & Gynecology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact