Mark Denbow

1.2k citations
24 papers · 683 · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

Mark Denbow

22 papers receiving 654 citations

Peers

Mark Denbow
Comparison fields: 5 of 74
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 407
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 586
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 94
  • Genetics 18
  • Biomaterials 20
Replace H.-R. Tinneberg with:
H.-R. Tinneberg Germany
D. A. L. Pedreira Brazil
F. Montoya Spain
Remah M. Kamel Saudi Arabia
Ani Amelia Zainuddin Malaysia
Gregório Lorenzo Acácio Brazil
F. Fàbregues Spain
M.W. Healy United States
Kléber Cursino de Andrade Brazil
Maria Agathokleous United Kingdom
Mark Denbow relative to H.-R. Tinneberg Germany H.-R. Tinneberg's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
H.-R. Tinneberg · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mark Denbow

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mark Denbow's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark Denbow with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark Denbow more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mark Denbow

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark Denbow. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark Denbow. The network helps show where Mark Denbow may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Mark Denbow, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Mark Denbow Line = papers co-authored together Mark Denbow links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 24 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2000336
2 199896
3 199849
4 200936
5 200034
6 200921
7 201719
8 199817
9 199714
10 200511
11 20139
12 20087
13 19986
14 20065
15 19975
16 19964
17 20053
18 19983
19 20163
20 20042

About Mark Denbow

Mark Denbow is a scholar working on Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Obstetrics and Gynecology, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging and Hematology, having authored 24 papers that have together received 683 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics (15 papers), Assisted Reproductive Technology and Twin Pregnancy (14 papers), Pregnancy and preeclampsia studies (13 papers), Fetal and Pediatric Neurological Disorders (5 papers), Ectopic Pregnancy Diagnosis and Management (3 papers), Blood groups and transfusion (2 papers), Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications (1 paper) and Hemoglobinopathies and Related Disorders (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Obstetrics and Gynecology (407 citations), Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (586 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (94 citations), Genetics (18 citations) and Biomaterials (20 citations). Mark Denbow has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Italy. Frequent co-authors include Nicholas M. Fisk, P. Cox, Myles Taylor, Donna M. Hammal, D.G. Talbert, Phillipa M. Kyle, Roberto Fogliani, Terence Cosgrove, Peter Soothill and Dong Qiu. Their work appears in journals such as Fetal Diagnosis and Therapy, Prenatal Diagnosis, American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, BJOG An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology and Radiology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact