Mark D. Parrish

963 citations
41 papers · 775 · h-index 16

Impact in

Papers in

Mark D. Parrish

39 papers receiving 700 citations

Peers

Mark D. Parrish
Comparison fields: 5 of 88
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 340
  • Epidemiology 274
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 163
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 82
  • Complementary and alternative medicine 37
Replace Anna Axelsson Raja with:
Anna Axelsson Raja Denmark
Michael Preuß United States
Jan M. Nielsen Denmark
Rong Lin China
Peter A. Nickerson United States
A. Sidney Harris United States
Pilar Molina Spain
Richard D. Carr Denmark
М М Миррахимов Russia
Zhen He China
Mark D. Parrish relative to Anna Axelsson Raja Denmark Anna Axelsson Raja's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×6.2×
Anna Axelsson Raja · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mark D. Parrish

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mark D. Parrish's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark D. Parrish with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark D. Parrish more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mark D. Parrish

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark D. Parrish. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark D. Parrish. The network helps show where Mark D. Parrish may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Mark D. Parrish, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Mark D. Parrish Line = papers co-authored together Mark D. Parrish links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 41 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 198397
2 201370
3 198367
4 198344
5 199243
6 198243
7 198740
8 198739
9 198231
10 200029
11 198229
12 198525
13 202323
14 198523
15 198419
16 198419
17 198312
18 199511
19 198611
20 20209

About Mark D. Parrish

Mark D. Parrish is a scholar working on Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Epidemiology, Surgery, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, having authored 41 papers that have together received 775 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Congenital Heart Disease Studies (11 papers), Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors (8 papers), Cardiac Ischemia and Reperfusion (7 papers), Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics (6 papers), Hemodynamic Monitoring and Therapy (4 papers), Renal and Vascular Pathologies (4 papers), Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias (3 papers) and Insect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (340 citations), Epidemiology (274 citations), Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (163 citations), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (82 citations) and Complementary and alternative medicine (37 citations). Mark D. Parrish has collaborated with scholars based in United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include T.P. Graham, Robert J. Boucek, H. G. Fowler, C. Leon Partain, Robert C. Boerth, Mark Born, Harvey W. Bender, David E. Fixler, J. Jones and Gottlieb C. Friesinger. Their work appears in journals such as The American Journal of Cardiology, Circulation, American Heart Journal, Pediatric Research and Journal of Economic Entomology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact