Mark D. Chappell
Impact in
- Organic Chemistry top 5%
- Synthetic Organic Chemistry Methods
- Carbohydrate Chemistry and Synthesis
- Advanced Synthetic Organic Chemistry
- Asymmetric Synthesis and Catalysis
-
- Cancer Treatment and Pharmacology
Papers in
-
- Synthetic Organic Chemistry Methods 8
- Advanced Synthetic Organic Chemistry 7
- Carbohydrate Chemistry and Synthesis 6
- Chemical synthesis and alkaloids 2
- Oncology 9
- Cancer Treatment and Pharmacology 9
- Co-authors
- Randall L. Halcomb (6 shared papers)Samuel J. Danishefsky (9 shared papers)Shawn J. Stachel (8 shared papers)Chul Bom Lee (8 shared papers)Ting‐Chao Chou (8 shared papers)Yongbiao Guan (5 shared papers)Lifeng He (3 shared papers)Susan Band Horwitz (3 shared papers)
- Journals
- The Journal of Organic Chemistry (4 papers)Organic Letters (3 papers)Journal of the American Chemical Society (3 papers)Tetrahedron (1 paper)Tetrahedron Letters (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Mark D. Chappell
15 papers receiving 431 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 47
- Organic Chemistry 376
- Oncology 132
- Biotechnology 45
- Pharmacology 71
- Molecular Biology 209
Countries citing papers authored by Mark D. Chappell
This map shows the geographic impact of Mark D. Chappell's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark D. Chappell with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark D. Chappell more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Mark D. Chappell
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark D. Chappell. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark D. Chappell. The network helps show where Mark D. Chappell may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 22 scholars most cited alongside Mark D. Chappell, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2002 | 83 | |
| 2 | 2001 | 52 | |
| 3 | 2002 | 44 | |
| 4 | 2001 | 41 | |
| 5 | 2000 | 37 | |
| 6 | 2000 | 34 | |
| 7 | 1997 | 32 | |
| 8 | 2001 | 29 | |
| 9 | 2000 | 28 | |
| 10 | 2000 | 21 | |
| 11 | 1997 | 20 | |
| 12 | 2002 | 15 | |
| 13 | 1999 | 8 | |
| 14 | 2001 | 1 | |
| 15 | 2000 | 1 |
About Mark D. Chappell
Mark D. Chappell is a scholar working on Organic Chemistry, Oncology, Molecular Biology, Biotechnology and Plant Science, having authored 15 papers that have together received 446 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cancer Treatment and Pharmacology (9 papers), Synthetic Organic Chemistry Methods (8 papers), Advanced Synthetic Organic Chemistry (7 papers), Carbohydrate Chemistry and Synthesis (6 papers), Glycosylation and Glycoproteins Research (5 papers), Chemical Synthesis and Analysis (4 papers), Chemical synthesis and alkaloids (2 papers) and Enzyme Production and Characterization (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Organic Chemistry (376 citations), Oncology (132 citations), Biotechnology (45 citations), Pharmacology (71 citations) and Molecular Biology (209 citations). Mark D. Chappell has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Randall L. Halcomb, Samuel J. Danishefsky, Shawn J. Stachel, Chul Bom Lee, Ting‐Chao Chou, Yongbiao Guan, Lifeng He, Susan Band Horwitz, Zhicai Wu and Hong Lin. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of Organic Chemistry, Organic Letters, Journal of the American Chemical Society, Tetrahedron and Tetrahedron Letters.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.