Mark Costanzo

2.2k citations
40 papers · 1.6k · h-index 21

Impact in

Papers in

Mark Costanzo

38 papers receiving 1.4k citations

Peers

Mark Costanzo
Comparison fields: 5 of 112
  • Gender Studies 302
  • Social Psychology 522
  • Applied Psychology 95
  • Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law 247
  • General Psychology 23
Replace Blake M. McKimmie with:
Blake M. McKimmie Australia
Jeffrey H. Goldstein United States
Jack Arbuthnot United States
Adam R. Pearson United States
Shawn M. Burn United States
J. Christopher Cohrs Germany
Elizabeth Mullen United States
Ngaire Donaghue Australia
Charles A. Scherbaum United States
Brad J. Sagarin United States
Mark Costanzo relative to Blake M. McKimmie Australia Blake M. McKimmie's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×7.7×
Blake M. McKimmie · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mark Costanzo

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mark Costanzo's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark Costanzo with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark Costanzo more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mark Costanzo

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark Costanzo. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark Costanzo. The network helps show where Mark Costanzo may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Mark Costanzo, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Mark Costanzo Line = papers co-authored together Mark Costanzo links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 40 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1986260
2
Gender issues in contemporary society
1993257
3 1989220
4 1988114
5 199894
6 199589
7 200952
8 199241
9 199441
10 199240
11 199134
12 201033
13 200733
14
Just Revenge: Costs and Consequences of the Death Penalty
199730
15 199429
16 199926
17
Energy conservation and public policy:: The mediation of individual behavior
198623
18 200322
19 200820
20
Psychology Applied to Law
200320

About Mark Costanzo

Mark Costanzo is a scholar working on Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science, Clinical Psychology, Law and Cognitive Neuroscience, having authored 40 papers that have together received 1.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Deception detection and forensic psychology (13 papers), Jury Decision Making Processes (8 papers), Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending (7 papers), Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis (6 papers), Torture, Ethics, and Law (5 papers), Memory Processes and Influences (3 papers), Social and Intergroup Psychology (3 papers) and Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Gender Studies (302 citations), Social Psychology (522 citations), Applied Psychology (95 citations), Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law (247 citations) and General Psychology (23 citations). Mark Costanzo has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Dane Archer, Stuart Oskamp, Elliot Aronson, Thomas F. Pettigrew, Martin M. Chemers, Marti Hope Gonzales, Ellen Gerrity, Stella M. Nkomo, M. Brinton Lykes and Heather J. Smith. Their work appears in journals such as Law and Human Behavior, Journal of Educational Psychology, American Psychologist, Behavioral Sciences & the Law and Journal of Nonverbal Behavior.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact