Mark Conroy

23 papers receiving 442 citations

Peers

Mark Conroy
Comparison fields: 5 of 98
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine 45
  • Agronomy and Crop Science 83
  • Plant Science 176
  • Soil Science 30
  • Rehabilitation 20
Replace Jonathan D. Reich with:
Jonathan D. Reich United States
Makoto Arakawa Japan
Mark A. Taylor United States
Felipe Rodríguez Chile
Benoît Côté Canada
Yue Su China
William D. Moore United States
Alberto Sartori Italy
Guicheng Wu China
Mark Conroy relative to Jonathan D. Reich United States Jonathan D. Reich's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×7.5×
Jonathan D. Reich · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mark Conroy

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mark Conroy's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark Conroy with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark Conroy more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mark Conroy

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark Conroy. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark Conroy. The network helps show where Mark Conroy may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Mark Conroy, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Mark Conroy Line = papers co-authored together Mark Conroy links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 27 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1994189
2 201736
3 200634
4
Ringer's ethyl pyruvate in hemorrhagic shock and resuscitation does not improve early hemodynamics or tissue energetics.
200531
5 200323
6 200121
7 200520
8 200620
9 199917
10 199217
11 201417
12 201810
13 20247
14
Modernism and authority : strategies of legitimation in Flaubert and Conrad
19857
15 20216
16 19946
17 20065
18 20045
19 20114
20 20203

About Mark Conroy

Mark Conroy is a scholar working on Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Literature and Literary Theory and Surgery, having authored 27 papers that have together received 481 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications (5 papers), Trauma, Hemostasis, Coagulopathy, Resuscitation (3 papers), Hemodynamic Monitoring and Therapy (2 papers), Innovations in Medical Education (2 papers), Musculoskeletal Disorders and Rehabilitation (2 papers), Renal function and acid-base balance (2 papers), COVID-19 Clinical Research Studies (2 papers) and SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine (45 citations), Agronomy and Crop Science (83 citations), Plant Science (176 citations), Soil Science (30 citations) and Rehabilitation (20 citations). Mark Conroy has collaborated with scholars based in United States, France and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Bruce E. Hammer, Sharon R. Aarons, Carmen Quinto, Esperanza Martı́nez-Romero, Peter Graham, Mark L. Ferrey, Gregory J. Beilman, Rex Lovrien, Jodie H. Taylor and Kristine E. Mulier. Their work appears in journals such as Anti-Cancer Drugs, Shock, The American Journal of Emergency Medicine, Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine and Journal of Pain and Symptom Management.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact