Mark Chun

3.1k citations
98 papers · 640 · h-index 15

Impact in

Papers in

Mark Chun

83 papers receiving 590 citations

Peers

Mark Chun
Comparison fields: 5 of 73
  • Instrumentation 89
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics 243
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 325
  • Immunology 86
  • Electrical and Electronic Engineering 201
Replace Élodie Choquet with:
Élodie Choquet France
C. G. Wynne United Kingdom
Richard G. Lane United States
Sarah Tuttle United States
T. E. Pickering United States
J.‐M. Conan France
Qian Gong United States
Xifeng Xiao United States
Olivier Lardière Canada
Noriaki Miura Japan
Mark Chun relative to Élodie Choquet France Élodie Choquet's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5×12.3×
Élodie Choquet · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mark Chun

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mark Chun's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark Chun with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark Chun more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mark Chun

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark Chun. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark Chun. The network helps show where Mark Chun may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Mark Chun, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Mark Chun Line = papers co-authored together Mark Chun links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 98 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 197949
2 200547
3 200844
4 200938
5 202231
6 201324
7 198121
8 201418
9 200817
10 198516
11 200016
12 200615
13 200515
14 200815
15 200015
16 199813
17 201511
18 201611
19 200810
20 201910

About Mark Chun

Mark Chun is a scholar working on Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Astronomy and Astrophysics, Biomedical Engineering and Instrumentation, having authored 98 papers that have together received 640 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Adaptive optics and wavefront sensing (61 papers), Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies (33 papers), Optical Systems and Laser Technology (21 papers), Astronomy and Astrophysical Research (17 papers), Advanced optical system design (16 papers), Optical Wireless Communication Technologies (14 papers), Astro and Planetary Science (13 papers) and Astrophysics and Star Formation Studies (8 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Instrumentation (89 citations), Astronomy and Astrophysics (243 citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (325 citations), Immunology (86 citations) and Electrical and Electronic Engineering (201 citations). Mark Chun has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Chile and France. Frequent co-authors include Michael K. Hoffmann, J. Vernin, Christ Ftaclas, R. Ávila, Andreï Tokovinin, Douglas W. Toomey, A. Ziad, Ulrich Hämmerling, T. Cherubini and Steven Businger. Their work appears in journals such as Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific, The Astronomical Journal, The Astrophysical Journal and Journal of Astronomical Telescopes Instruments and Systems.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact