Mark Caprio

3.7k citations
105 papers · 3.1k · h-index 32

Impact in

Papers in

Mark Caprio

105 papers receiving 3k citations

Peers

Mark Caprio
Comparison fields: 5 of 41
  • Nuclear and High Energy Physics 2.9k
  • Statistical and Nonlinear Physics 76
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 107
  • Radiation 25
  • Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics 13
Replace G. Bencze with:
G. Bencze Switzerland
W. E. Ormand United States
Eugene Golowich United States
R. Eckmann United States
M. Gaspero United States
BRUCE R. BARRETT United States
P. Griffith Switzerland
Mateusz Mazur United States
R. Nogowski United States
Q. K. Wong United States
Mark Caprio relative to G. Bencze Switzerland G. Bencze's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2×2.3×
G. Bencze · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mark Caprio

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mark Caprio's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark Caprio with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark Caprio more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mark Caprio

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark Caprio. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark Caprio. The network helps show where Mark Caprio may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Mark Caprio, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Mark Caprio Line = papers co-authored together Mark Caprio links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 105 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2001276
2 2002174
3 2002128
4 2013109
5 2005108
6 2003106
7 200585
8 200184
9 200282
10 200672
11 200970
12 200263
13 200561
14 200459
15 200154
16 200552
17 201252
18 200051
19 200450
20 200249

About Mark Caprio

Mark Caprio is a scholar working on Nuclear and High Energy Physics, Radiation, Statistical and Nonlinear Physics, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics and Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics, having authored 105 papers that have together received 3.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Nuclear physics research studies (102 papers), Quantum chaos and dynamical systems (2 papers), Quantum many-body systems (2 papers), Radioactive Decay and Measurement Techniques (2 papers), Molecular Spectroscopy and Structure (1 paper), Quantum Mechanics and Applications (1 paper), Mathematical and Computational Methods (1 paper) and Particle Detector Development and Performance (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Nuclear and High Energy Physics (2.9k citations), Statistical and Nonlinear Physics (76 citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (107 citations), Radiation (25 citations) and Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics (13 citations). Mark Caprio has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Germany and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include FRANCESCO IACHELLO, Pieter Maris, C. W. Beausang, Richard F. Casten, James P. Vary, R. Krücken, A. A. Hecht, N. V. Zamfir, J. R. Novak and C. J. Barton. Their work appears in journals such as Physical Review C, Physical Review Letters, Physics Letters B, Nuclear Physics A and The European Physical Journal A.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact