Mark Callister

27 papers receiving 401 citations

Peers

Mark Callister
Comparison fields: 5 of 72
  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology 55
  • Gender Studies 135
  • Literature and Literary Theory 101
  • Pharmacy 30
  • Communication 46
Replace Jessica D. Zurcher with:
Jessica D. Zurcher United States
Nicole Lofaro United States
Maya K. Gordon United States
Tracey Owens Patton United States
Anneke Sools Netherlands
Hannah Kang United States
Frans Oldersma Netherlands
Abe Arkoff United States
Kim Bissell United States
Rebecca F. Guy United States
Mark Callister relative to Jessica D. Zurcher United States Jessica D. Zurcher's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×15×
Jessica D. Zurcher · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mark Callister

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mark Callister's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark Callister with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark Callister more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mark Callister

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark Callister. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark Callister. The network helps show where Mark Callister may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 17 scholars most cited alongside Mark Callister, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Mark Callister Line = papers co-authored together Mark Callister links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 27 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200793
2 200855
3 199534
4 200733
5 200926
6 200920
7 201119
8 201118
9 200717
10 201217
11 202015
12 200814
13 201211
14 199410
15 201410
16 201910
17 201110
18 20219
19
Violence, Sexuality, and Gender Stereotyping: A Content Analysis of Official Video Game Web Sites
20098
20 20117

About Mark Callister

Mark Callister is a scholar working on Literature and Literary Theory, Gender Studies, Sociology and Political Science, Social Psychology and Education, having authored 27 papers that have together received 459 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Media Influence and Health (14 papers), Media, Gender, and Advertising (10 papers), Child Development and Digital Technology (7 papers), Bullying, Victimization, and Aggression (5 papers), Gender, Feminism, and Media (5 papers), Impact of Technology on Adolescents (4 papers), Hate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection (3 papers) and Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (55 citations), Gender Studies (135 citations), Literature and Literary Theory (101 citations), Pharmacy (30 citations) and Communication (46 citations). Mark Callister has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Tom Robinson, Lesa A. Stern, Jennifer Moore, Sarah M. Coyne, Laura Stockdale, Michael Burgoon, Renee Storm Klingle, Walid A. Afifi, David A. Nelson and Christopher Wilson. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Children and Media, Mass Communication & Society, Journal of Current Issues & Research in Advertising, Evaluation & the Health Professions and Body Image.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact