Mark Bell

832 citations
74 papers · 455 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

Mark Bell

58 papers receiving 337 citations

Peers

Mark Bell
Comparison fields: 5 of 56
  • Law 237
  • Political Science and International Relations 269
  • Public Administration 37
  • Gender Studies 58
  • Strategy and Management 58
Replace Annick Masselot with:
Annick Masselot New Zealand
John Lande United States
Colm O’Cinnéide United Kingdom
Karen O’Connor United States
Kevin T. McGuire United States
Pamela S. Karlan United States
Joyce S. Sterling United States
Laura Langer United States
Christina L. Boyd United States
Jeff Yates United States
Mark Bell relative to Annick Masselot New Zealand Annick Masselot's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.0×
Annick Masselot · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mark Bell

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mark Bell's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark Bell with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark Bell more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mark Bell

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark Bell. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark Bell. The network helps show where Mark Bell may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 12 scholars most cited alongside Mark Bell, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Mark Bell Line = papers co-authored together Mark Bell links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 74 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2002105
2 200840
3 200938
4 200126
5 201217
6
The principle of equal treatment: widening and deepening
201116
7 199916
8 201714
9 200413
10 200012
11 199911
12
Between flexicurity and fundamental social rights: the EU Directives on atypical work
20129
13 20119
14 20218
15 20077
16 20196
17 20146
18
Judicial Enforcement of the Duties on Public Authorities to Promote Equality
20105
19
Law. Traveller's checks.
20024
20 20184

About Mark Bell

Mark Bell is a scholar working on Law, Political Science and International Relations, Public Administration, Accounting and Strategy and Management, having authored 74 papers that have together received 455 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Discrimination and Equality Law (38 papers), European and International Law Studies (14 papers), Labor Movements and Unions (7 papers), Taxation and Legal Issues (5 papers), Social Policy and Reform Studies (5 papers), European Law and Migration (5 papers), European Union Policy and Governance (5 papers) and Employment and Welfare Studies (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Law (237 citations), Political Science and International Relations (269 citations), Public Administration (37 citations), Gender Studies (58 citations) and Strategy and Management (58 citations). Mark Bell has collaborated with scholars based in Ireland, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Lisa Waddington, Cees van der Vleuten, Joan Keesey, Jean V. McHale, Oluyinka Adejumo, Stephen A. Jarvis, Karl Atkin, Mark Johnson, Pat Bradshaw and Phyllis Sharps. Their work appears in journals such as Industrial Law Journal, European Law Review, Common Market Law Review, Modern Law Review and Social & Legal Studies.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact