Countries where authors publish in Common Market Law Review
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Common Market Law Review. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Common Market Law Review with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Common Market Law Review more than expected).
Fields of papers published in Common Market Law Review
This network shows the impact of papers published in Common Market Law Review. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Common Market Law Review.
About Common Market Law Review
The 2.5k papers published in Common Market Law Review in the last decades have received a total of 16.3k indexed citations . Papers published in Common Market Law Review usually cover Law (1.0k papers), Accounting (849 papers), Political Science and International Relations (1.3k papers), Strategy and Management (598 papers) and Finance (83 papers) specifically the topics of European and International Law Studies (916 papers), Taxation and Legal Issues (802 papers), EU Law and Policy Analysis (587 papers), Corporate Governance and Law (423 papers), European Criminal Justice and Data Protection (307 papers), European Union Policy and Governance (152 papers), European and International Contract Law (121 papers) and International Arbitration and Investment Law (115 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Common Market Law Review are Deirdre M. Curtin, Armin von Bogdandy, Koen Lenaerts, Niamh Nic Shuibhne, Michael B. Dougan, Vassilis George Hatzopoulos, Edoardo Chiti, Charlotte O’Brien, Daniel Thym and Norbert Reich.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.