Mark Barley

3.7k citations
45 papers · 3.2k · h-index 26

Impact in

Papers in

Mark Barley

45 papers receiving 3.0k citations

Peers

Mark Barley
Comparison fields: 5 of 79
  • Geochemistry and Petrology 1.2k
  • Paleontology 1.2k
  • Geophysics 2.0k
  • Geology 184
  • Atmospheric Science 510
Replace Wayne D. Goodfellow with:
Wayne D. Goodfellow Canada
Koshi Yamamoto Japan
Peter McGoldrick Australia
Robert Bolhar South Africa
Bryan Krapež Australia
R. F. Dymek United States
M. E. Barley Australia
Ross Stevenson Canada
Victor A. Melezhik Norway
K. M. Gillis Canada
Mark Barley relative to Wayne D. Goodfellow Canada Wayne D. Goodfellow's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Wayne D. Goodfellow · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mark Barley

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mark Barley's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark Barley with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark Barley more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mark Barley

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark Barley. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark Barley. The network helps show where Mark Barley may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Mark Barley, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Mark Barley Line = papers co-authored together Mark Barley links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 45 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2009410
2 2007333
3 2011319
4 2003195
5 2009164
6 2001154
7 1989129
8 1992123
9 2006123
10 1998116
11 2005109
12 2007108
13 198989
14 200783
15 200482
16 200476
17 201370
18 200769
19 200748
20 201441

About Mark Barley

Mark Barley is a scholar working on Geophysics, Artificial Intelligence, Paleontology, Geology and Geochemistry and Petrology, having authored 45 papers that have together received 3.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Geological and Geochemical Analysis (30 papers), Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping (19 papers), Paleontology and Stratigraphy of Fossils (15 papers), Geological and Geophysical Studies (13 papers), Geology and Paleoclimatology Research (10 papers), Geochemistry and Elemental Analysis (10 papers), earthquake and tectonic studies (7 papers) and Geological formations and processes (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Geochemistry and Petrology (1.2k citations), Paleontology (1.2k citations), Geophysics (2.0k citations), Geology (184 citations) and Atmospheric Science (510 citations). Mark Barley has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Lee R. Kump, Bryan Krapež, A.L. Pickard, David I. Groves, Kurt O. Konhauser, Stefan V. Lalonde, Ernesto Peçoits, Tim S. Blake, S.J.A Brown and Olivier Rouxel. Their work appears in journals such as Precambrian Research, Geology, Nature, Journal of Asian Earth Sciences and Mineralium Deposita.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact