Mark Ball
Impact in
Papers in
- Co-authors
- Michael F. Antolin (2 shared papers)Paul Stapp (1 shared paper)Paul J. Wilson (4 shared papers)Micheline Manseau (3 shared papers)Murray W. Lankester (3 shared papers)Laura Finnegan (2 shared papers)Richard Pither (1 shared paper)Shane P. Mahoney (2 shared papers)
- Journals
- Conservation Genetics (2 papers)Canadian Journal of Zoology (2 papers)Evolutionary Applications (1 paper)Journal of Wildlife Management (1 paper)Journal of Mammalogy (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- CanadaUnited StatesSlovakia
In The Last Decade
Mark Ball
15 papers receiving 455 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 47
- Ecology 306
- Genetics 280
- Parasitology 61
- Ecological Modeling 38
- Small Animals 26
Countries citing papers authored by Mark Ball
This map shows the geographic impact of Mark Ball's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark Ball with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark Ball more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Mark Ball
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark Ball. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark Ball. The network helps show where Mark Ball may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Mark Ball, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2004 | 123 | |
| 2 | 2006 | 89 | |
| 3 | The influence of sylvatic plague on North American wildlife at the landscape level, with special emphasis on black-footed ferret and prairie dog conservation | 2002 | 77 |
| 4 | 2010 | 52 | |
| 5 | 2001 | 31 | |
| 6 | 2010 | 13 | |
| 7 | 2001 | 13 | |
| 8 | 2010 | 13 | |
| 9 | 2016 | 12 | |
| 10 | 2010 | 11 | |
| 11 | 2016 | 10 | |
| 12 | 2021 | 9 | |
| 13 | 2021 | 9 | |
| 14 | COMPLEXITY AND INFORMATION GAPS IN RECOVERY PLANNING FOR MOOSE (ALCES ALCES AMERICANA) IN NOVA SCOTIA, CANADA | 2006 | 8 |
| 15 | 2001 | 3 |
About Mark Ball
Mark Ball is a scholar working on Ecology, Genetics, Molecular Biology, Insect Science and Small Animals, having authored 15 papers that have together received 473 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Wildlife Ecology and Conservation (6 papers), Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestock (4 papers), Parasite Biology and Host Interactions (3 papers), Genetic diversity and population structure (3 papers), Forensic and Genetic Research (2 papers), Animal Ecology and Behavior Studies (2 papers), Mollusks and Parasites Studies (2 papers) and Helminth infection and control (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ecology (306 citations), Genetics (280 citations), Parasitology (61 citations), Ecological Modeling (38 citations) and Small Animals (26 citations). Mark Ball has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United States and Slovakia. Frequent co-authors include Michael F. Antolin, Paul Stapp, Paul J. Wilson, Micheline Manseau, Murray W. Lankester, Laura Finnegan, Richard Pither, Shane P. Mahoney, Stephen D. Petersen and Dean E. Biggins. Their work appears in journals such as Conservation Genetics, Canadian Journal of Zoology, Evolutionary Applications, Journal of Wildlife Management and Journal of Mammalogy.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.