Mark Abrams

525 citations
32 papers · 274 · h-index 8

Impact in

Papers in

Mark Abrams

27 papers receiving 205 citations

Peers

Mark Abrams
Comparison fields: 5 of 58
  • Political Science and International Relations 91
  • Sociology and Political Science 163
  • History 28
  • Tourism, Leisure and Hospitality Management 4
  • Geography, Planning and Development 12
Replace Sybille van der Sprenkel with:
Sybille van der Sprenkel
Dominic J. Capeci United States
Glenn C. Altschuler United States
F.S.L. Lyons United Kingdom
James W. St. G. Walker Canada
Michael P. Hornsby‐Smith United Kingdom
Tissa Fernando Canada
Bruce E. Steiner United States
Betty A. Dobratz United States
Humbert S. Nelli United States
Mark Abrams relative to Sybille van der Sprenkel Sybille van der Sprenkel's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Sybille van der Sprenkel · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mark Abrams

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mark Abrams's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark Abrams with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark Abrams more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mark Abrams

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark Abrams. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark Abrams. The network helps show where Mark Abrams may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 6 scholars most cited alongside Mark Abrams, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Mark Abrams Line = papers co-authored together Mark Abrams links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 32 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 197049
2
Must Labour lose
196048
3 198544
4 195124
5
Racial discrimination in England : based on the P.E.P. report
196816
6 197016
7 19569
8 19638
9 19527
10 19626
11 19856
12 19786
13 19525
14 19535
15 19644
16 19563
17 19572
18 19792
19 19652
20 19592

About Mark Abrams

Mark Abrams is a scholar working on Political Science and International Relations, General Health Professions, Sociology and Political Science, Communication and Law, having authored 32 papers that have together received 274 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Political and Economic history of UK and US (2 papers), Global Health Care Issues (2 papers), Social Policy and Reform Studies (2 papers), Migration and Labor Dynamics (1 paper), Media Studies and Communication (1 paper), Communism, Protests, Social Movements (1 paper), Employment and Welfare Studies (1 paper) and Digital Games and Media (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Political Science and International Relations (91 citations), Sociology and Political Science (163 citations), History (28 citations), Tourism, Leisure and Hospitality Management (4 citations) and Geography, Planning and Development (12 citations). Mark Abrams has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Nigeria and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Richard Rose, Noel Timms, Nicholas Deakin, Christine Möser, Daniel Jones and Irving Roshwalb. Their work appears in journals such as International Affairs, Public Opinion Quarterly, Futures, British Journal of Sociology and The Economic Journal.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact