Mark Abrams

525 citations
33 papers · 346 · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

Mark Abrams

28 papers receiving 240 citations

Peers

Mark Abrams
Comparison fields: 5 of 60
  • Sociology and Political Science 206
  • Political Science and International Relations 111
  • History 42
  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology 5
  • Health 23
Replace John F. McClymer with:
John F. McClymer United States
Franklin D. Mitchell United States
Bruce E. Steiner United States
Rudolph J. Vecoli United States
Merton L. Dillon United States
Reg Whitaker Canada
F.S.L. Lyons United Kingdom
Janet Roebuck United States
Betty A. Dobratz United States
Sybille van der Sprenkel United Kingdom
Mark Abrams relative to John F. McClymer United States John F. McClymer's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×
John F. McClymer · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mark Abrams

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mark Abrams's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark Abrams with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark Abrams more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mark Abrams

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark Abrams. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark Abrams. The network helps show where Mark Abrams may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 6 scholars most cited alongside Mark Abrams, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Mark Abrams Line = papers co-authored together Mark Abrams links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 33 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 198561
2 197059
3
Must Labour lose
196054
4 195127
5
Racial discrimination in England : based on the P.E.P. report
196820
6 197019
7 195214
8 198511
9 195610
10 19639
11 19628
12 19647
13 19787
14 19527
15 19537
16 19854
17 19653
18 19563
19 19572
20 19792

About Mark Abrams

Mark Abrams is a scholar working on Political Science and International Relations, General Health Professions, Sociology and Political Science, Communication and Law, having authored 33 papers that have together received 346 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Global Health Care Issues (2 papers), Political and Economic history of UK and US (2 papers), Social Policy and Reform Studies (2 papers), Discrimination and Equality Law (1 paper), Media Studies and Communication (1 paper), demographic modeling and climate adaptation (1 paper), Migration and Labor Dynamics (1 paper) and Employment and Welfare Studies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Sociology and Political Science (206 citations), Political Science and International Relations (111 citations), History (42 citations), Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (5 citations) and Health (23 citations). Mark Abrams has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Germany and Nigeria. Frequent co-authors include Noel Timms, Richard Rose, Nicholas Deakin, Christine Möser, Daniel Jones and Irving Roshwalb. Their work appears in journals such as Public Opinion Quarterly, International Affairs, Futures, The Economic Journal and British Journal of Sociology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact