Mariya Brussevich
About
In The Last Decade
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Mariya Brussevich
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Mariya Brussevich. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Mariya Brussevich based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Mariya Brussevich. Mariya Brussevich is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Mariya Brussevich
18 papers receiving 161 citations
Fields of papers citing papers by Mariya Brussevich
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mariya Brussevich. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mariya Brussevich. The network helps show where Mariya Brussevich may publish in the future.
Countries citing papers authored by Mariya Brussevich
This map shows the geographic impact of Mariya Brussevich's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mariya Brussevich with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mariya Brussevich more than expected).
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.