Maria Miceli

1.8k citations
50 papers · 1.3k · h-index 21

Impact in

Papers in

Maria Miceli

48 papers receiving 1.1k citations

Peers

Maria Miceli
Comparison fields: 5 of 114
  • Social Psychology 551
  • Applied Psychology 116
  • General Decision Sciences 32
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 191
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 246
Replace Judith Schwartz with:
Judith Schwartz United States
Anna van 't Veer Netherlands
Marc‐André Reinhard Germany
Joel D. Lieberman United States
Lori Sheppard United States
Juliana Schroeder United States
Kathryn C. Oleson United States
Linda Bol United States
Michael Y. Lau United States
Abraham M. Rutchick United States
Maria Miceli relative to Judith Schwartz United States Judith Schwartz's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Judith Schwartz · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Maria Miceli

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Maria Miceli's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Maria Miceli with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Maria Miceli more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Maria Miceli

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Maria Miceli. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Maria Miceli. The network helps show where Maria Miceli may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 23 scholars most cited alongside Maria Miceli, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Maria Miceli Line = papers co-authored together Maria Miceli links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 50 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2007134
2 200593
3 201089
4
Expectancy and Emotion
201479
5 201876
6 200368
7 199857
8 198951
9 200949
10 200646
11
Personality-Driven Social Behaviors in Believable Agents
199745
12 200244
13 199239
14 201838
15 199237
16 200035
17 198635
18 201732
19 201123
20 199721

About Maria Miceli

Maria Miceli is a scholar working on Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science, Cognitive Neuroscience, Clinical Psychology and Artificial Intelligence, having authored 50 papers that have together received 1.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Emotions and Moral Behavior (16 papers), Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (7 papers), Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation (5 papers), Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction (4 papers), Optimism, Hope, and Well-being (4 papers), Psychology of Social Influence (4 papers), Evolutionary Game Theory and Cooperation (4 papers) and Opinion Dynamics and Social Influence (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Social Psychology (551 citations), Applied Psychology (116 citations), General Decision Sciences (32 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (191 citations) and Cognitive Neuroscience (246 citations). Maria Miceli has collaborated with scholars based in Italy, United States and Czechia. Frequent co-authors include Cristiano Castelfranchi, Amedeo Cesta, Andrew Ortony, Fiorella de Rosis, Isabella Poggi, Paola Rizzo, Maury Silver, Rosaria Conte, Isabella Poggi and John Sabini. Their work appears in journals such as Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, Theory & Psychology, New Ideas in Psychology, Emotion Review and Review of General Psychology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact