Religion Compass

538 papers and 1.5k indexed citations i.

About

The 538 papers published in Religion Compass in the last decades have received a total of 1.5k indexed citations. Papers published in Religion Compass usually cover Sociology and Political Science (322 papers), Political Science and International Relations (151 papers) and Religious studies (148 papers) specifically the topics of Religion and Society Interactions (96 papers), Politics of Islamic Reform in Middle East (65 papers) and Biblical Studies and Interpretation (58 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Religion Compass are Justin L. Barrett, Kim Knott, Joel Robbins, Jon Bialecki, Naomi Haynes, Антон Шеховцов, Sigurd Bergmann, Fiona Bowie, Kenneth Baxter Wolf and Christopher Craig Brittain.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Religion Compass

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Religion Compass. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Religion Compass.

Countries where authors publish in Religion Compass

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Religion Compass. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Religion Compass with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Religion Compass more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025