Marek Rękas

1.9k citations
117 papers · 1.1k · h-index 19

Impact in

Papers in

Marek Rękas

106 papers receiving 1.1k citations

Peers

Marek Rękas
Comparison fields: 5 of 100
  • Ophthalmology 884
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 660
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 119
  • Biophysics 36
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 133
Replace Michael Stur with:
Michael Stur Austria
Gökhan Pekel Türkiye
Lukas Reznicek Germany
Manishi Desai United States
Hyung Woo Kwak South Korea
Asaf Achiron Israel
Jeffrey K. Luttrull United States
Alina Bakunowicz‐Łazarczyk Poland
Alan F. Cruess Canada
Ho Sik Hwang South Korea
Marek Rękas relative to Michael Stur Austria Michael Stur's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.1×
Michael Stur · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Marek Rękas

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Marek Rękas's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Marek Rękas with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Marek Rękas more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Marek Rękas

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Marek Rękas. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Marek Rękas. The network helps show where Marek Rękas may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Marek Rękas, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Marek Rękas Line = papers co-authored together Marek Rękas links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 117 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2014120
2 200868
3 200946
4 201832
5 202132
6 201730
7 202027
8 201726
9 201726
10 202125
11 202125
12 201624
13 201323
14 201523
15 201922
16 201522
17 201622
18 201719
19 202119
20 202017

About Marek Rękas

Marek Rękas is a scholar working on Ophthalmology, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Epidemiology and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, having authored 117 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Glaucoma and retinal disorders (53 papers), Corneal surgery and disorders (45 papers), Intraocular Surgery and Lenses (30 papers), Retinal Diseases and Treatments (18 papers), Ocular Surface and Contact Lens (12 papers), Ophthalmology and Eye Disorders (12 papers), Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies (11 papers) and Retinal and Optic Conditions (11 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ophthalmology (884 citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (660 citations), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (119 citations), Biophysics (36 citations) and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (133 citations). Marek Rękas has collaborated with scholars based in Poland, United States and India. Frequent co-authors include Joanna Konopińska, Zofia Mariak, Andrzej Stankiewicz, Robert Montés‐Micó, Antonio Maria Fea, Tomasz Żarnowski, Alejandro Cerviño, Luís E. Pablo, Lydia Chang and L. Jay Katz. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Clinical Medicine, Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery, Scientific Reports, Clinical ophthalmology and Graefe s Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact