Marcel Novaes

1.1k citations
49 papers · 655 · h-index 14

Impact in

Papers in

Marcel Novaes

43 papers receiving 645 citations

Peers

Marcel Novaes
Comparison fields: 5 of 71
  • Statistical and Nonlinear Physics 375
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 358
  • Statistics and Probability 72
  • Condensed Matter Physics 94
  • Acoustics and Ultrasonics 6
Replace Frank-Michael Dittes with:
Frank-Michael Dittes Germany
Eldad Bettelheim Israel
Luis Benet Mexico
Arul Lakshminarayan India
Gregory Berkolaiko United States
Christophe Texier France
Pierpaolo Vivo United Kingdom
J. A. Méndez‐Bermúdez Mexico
Alexandre Krajenbrink France
Walter F. Wreszinski Brazil
Marcel Novaes relative to Frank-Michael Dittes Germany Frank-Michael Dittes's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.7×
Frank-Michael Dittes · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Marcel Novaes

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Marcel Novaes's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Marcel Novaes with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Marcel Novaes more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Marcel Novaes

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Marcel Novaes. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Marcel Novaes. The network helps show where Marcel Novaes may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 19 scholars most cited alongside Marcel Novaes, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Marcel Novaes Line = papers co-authored together Marcel Novaes links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 49 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201894
2 200662
3 199750
4 201746
5 201338
6 200838
7 200231
8 200930
9 200730
10 201220
11 200419
12 200619
13 200817
14 201515
15 201312
16 201210
17 201010
18 20059
19 20039
20 20048

About Marcel Novaes

Marcel Novaes is a scholar working on Statistical and Nonlinear Physics, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Spectroscopy, Statistics and Probability and Computer Networks and Communications, having authored 49 papers that have together received 655 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Quantum chaos and dynamical systems (34 papers), Cold Atom Physics and Bose-Einstein Condensates (10 papers), Quantum many-body systems (9 papers), Molecular spectroscopy and chirality (7 papers), Quantum optics and atomic interactions (7 papers), Random Matrices and Applications (7 papers), Nonlinear Dynamics and Pattern Formation (5 papers) and Quantum Information and Cryptography (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Statistical and Nonlinear Physics (375 citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (358 citations), Statistics and Probability (72 citations), Condensed Matter Physics (94 citations) and Acoustics and Ultrasonics (6 citations). Marcel Novaes has collaborated with scholars based in Brazil, United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Pierpaolo Vivo, Giacomo Livan, Jonathan P. Keating, Marcus A. M. de Aguiar, Sandra D. Prado, Martin Sieber, Jean‐Pierre Gazeau, Auro del Giglio, Israel Bendit and Bernardo Garicochea. Their work appears in journals such as Physical Review A, Journal of Physics A Mathematical and Theoretical, Physical review. E, Physical Review B and Europhysics Letters (EPL).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact