Malcolm Hogg

21 papers receiving 492 citations

Peers

Malcolm Hogg
Comparison fields: 5 of 71
  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine 144
  • Pharmacology 246
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 108
  • Emergency Medicine 50
  • Complementary and alternative medicine 40
Replace Patricia Bruckenthal with:
Patricia Bruckenthal United States
Beth DeRonne United States
Donna Kalauokalani United States
Lynn Cooper Canada
Thepikaa Varatharajan Canada
Richard L. Stieg United States
Kevin Galloway United States
Margarete L. Zalon United States
Barbara St. Marie United States
Valerie Hruschak United States
Malcolm Hogg relative to Patricia Bruckenthal United States Patricia Bruckenthal's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.9×
Patricia Bruckenthal · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Malcolm Hogg

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Malcolm Hogg's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Malcolm Hogg with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Malcolm Hogg more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Malcolm Hogg

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Malcolm Hogg. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Malcolm Hogg. The network helps show where Malcolm Hogg may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Malcolm Hogg, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Malcolm Hogg Line = papers co-authored together Malcolm Hogg links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 23 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201296
2 201957
3 201054
4 200440
5 201038
6 202036
7 201630
8 201828
9 201321
10 201214
11 201312
12 201512
13 199812
14 201410
15 20159
16 20158
17 20238
18 19967
19
Evaluation of a topical anesthetic for use in urology.
19674
20 20203

About Malcolm Hogg

Malcolm Hogg is a scholar working on Pharmacology, Surgery, Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, having authored 23 papers that have together received 501 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (11 papers), Anesthesia and Pain Management (6 papers), Pain Management and Opioid Use (5 papers), Pediatric Pain Management Techniques (4 papers), Trauma and Emergency Care Studies (3 papers), Opioid Use Disorder Treatment (3 papers), Pain Management and Placebo Effect (3 papers) and Dental Anxiety and Anesthesia Techniques (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (144 citations), Pharmacology (246 citations), Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (108 citations), Emergency Medicine (50 citations) and Complementary and alternative medicine (40 citations). Malcolm Hogg has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United Kingdom and Singapore. Frequent co-authors include Michael J. Farrell, Carolyn Arnold, Stephen J. Gibson, Meaghan O’Donnell, Owen D. Williamson, Kate Leslie, Amy Prosser, Alex Konstantatos, Anne Burke and Andrew Bucknill. Their work appears in journals such as Pain Medicine, Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, British Journal of Anaesthesia, Anesthesia & Analgesia and The Medical Journal of Australia.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact