Malcolm E. Forster

91 papers receiving 1.9k citations

Peers

Malcolm E. Forster
Comparison fields: 5 of 100
  • Aquatic Science 826
  • Ecology 1.4k
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 529
  • Physiology 135
  • Immunology 371
Replace William R. Driedzic with:
William R. Driedzic Canada
Kenneth J. Rodnick United States
Keith Choe United States
Guido van den Thillart Netherlands
M. Danielle McDonald United States
Grant B. McClelland Canada
James S. Ballantyne Canada
Yung‐Che Tseng Taiwan
D. F. Houlihan United Kingdom
Ana Lúcia Kalinin Brazil
Malcolm E. Forster relative to William R. Driedzic Canada William R. Driedzic's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
William R. Driedzic · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Malcolm E. Forster

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Malcolm E. Forster's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Malcolm E. Forster with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Malcolm E. Forster more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Malcolm E. Forster

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Malcolm E. Forster. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Malcolm E. Forster. The network helps show where Malcolm E. Forster may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Malcolm E. Forster, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Malcolm E. Forster Line = papers co-authored together Malcolm E. Forster links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 91 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1992102
2 196790
3 200461
4 198761
5 200960
6 197159
7 198653
8 200249
9 201147
10 198146
11 199444
12 200842
13 198842
14 199241
15 200740
16 199840
17 198640
18 199039
19 198838
20 200533

About Malcolm E. Forster

Malcolm E. Forster is a scholar working on Ecology, Aquatic Science, Nature and Landscape Conservation, Immunology and Physiology, having authored 91 papers that have together received 2.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Physiological and biochemical adaptations (72 papers), Aquaculture Nutrition and Growth (44 papers), Fish Ecology and Management Studies (22 papers), Aquaculture disease management and microbiota (15 papers), Fish biology, ecology, and behavior (9 papers), Reproductive biology and impacts on aquatic species (8 papers), High Altitude and Hypoxia (8 papers) and Meat and Animal Product Quality (8 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Aquatic Science (826 citations), Ecology (1.4k citations), Nature and Landscape Conservation (529 citations), Physiology (135 citations) and Immunology (371 citations). Malcolm E. Forster has collaborated with scholars based in New Zealand, Australia and United States. Frequent co-authors include William Davison, Michael Axelsson, H. H. Taylor, Craig E. Franklin, Anthony P. Farrell, Jonathan V. Hill, Peter S. Davie, Stefan Nilsson, Mark Richards and Hamish Prosser. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Experimental Biology, Journal of Comparative Physiology B, Fish Physiology and Biochemistry, Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology Part C Toxicology & Pharmacology and Journal of Food Science.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact