Malcolm D. Graham

115 papers receiving 2.2k citations

Peers

Malcolm D. Graham
Comparison fields: 5 of 116
  • Otorhinolaryngology 768
  • Sensory Systems 292
  • Neurology 900
  • Neurology 488
  • Oncology 584
Replace Jack L. Pulec with:
Jack L. Pulec United States
Stephen G. Harner United States
Richard J. Wiet United States
George T. Nager United States
Galdino E. Valvassori United States
Jack M. Kartush United States
Vincent Darrouzet France
C. Gary Jackson United States
T. Palva Finland
Newton J. Coker United States
Malcolm D. Graham relative to Jack L. Pulec United States Jack L. Pulec's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.8×
Jack L. Pulec · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Malcolm D. Graham

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Malcolm D. Graham's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Malcolm D. Graham with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Malcolm D. Graham more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Malcolm D. Graham

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Malcolm D. Graham. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Malcolm D. Graham. The network helps show where Malcolm D. Graham may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Malcolm D. Graham, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Malcolm D. Graham Line = papers co-authored together Malcolm D. Graham links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 119 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1977130
2 197795
3 197980
4 199079
5
Temporal bone encephalocele and cerebrospinal fluid leaks.
199677
6 197973
7 198569
8 199168
9 198458
10 198558
11 198556
12
Neurophysiologic intraoperative monitoring: II. Facial nerve function.
198954
13
Ototoxicity and ototopical medications: a survey of otolaryngologists.
199352
14 198352
15 198650
16 198945
17 198545
18 196344
19 198839
20 198938

About Malcolm D. Graham

Malcolm D. Graham is a scholar working on Surgery, Otorhinolaryngology, Oncology, Neurology and Neurology, having authored 119 papers that have together received 2.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ear Surgery and Otitis Media (34 papers), Ear and Head Tumors (31 papers), Vestibular and auditory disorders (25 papers), Meningioma and schwannoma management (21 papers), Facial Nerve Paralysis Treatment and Research (19 papers), Head and Neck Surgical Oncology (18 papers), Ophthalmology and Eye Disorders (9 papers) and Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics (8 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Otorhinolaryngology (768 citations), Sensory Systems (292 citations), Neurology (900 citations), Neurology (488 citations) and Oncology (584 citations). Malcolm D. Graham has collaborated with scholars based in United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Jack M. Kartush, John L. Kemink, J. L. Kemink, John K. Niparko, Larry Lundy, Michael J. LaRouere, Derald E. Brackmann, James L. Sheehy, J T Latack and Robert T. Sataloff. Their work appears in journals such as The Laryngoscope, Annals of Otology Rhinology & Laryngology, The Journal of Laryngology & Otology, Otolaryngology and Otolaryngologic Clinics of North America.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact