Malcolm C. Pike
Impact in
- Oncology top 0.1%
- Cancer Risks and Factors
- Global Cancer Incidence and Screening
- Reproductive Medicine top 0.1%
Papers in
- Co-authors
- Brian E. Henderson (75 shared papers)Ronald K. Ross (22 shared papers)Leslie Bernstein (33 shared papers)John T. Casagrande (19 shared papers)Anna H. Wu (40 shared papers)Laurence N. Kolonel (35 shared papers)Richard Peto (2 shared papers)Celeste Leigh Pearce (25 shared papers)
- Journals
- British Journal of Cancer (26 papers)JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute (22 papers)The Lancet (19 papers)American Journal of Epidemiology (16 papers)Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention (14 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited KingdomCanada
In The Last Decade
Malcolm C. Pike
398 papers receiving 31.1k citations
Malcolm C. Pike's Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 216
- Oncology 8.1k
- Reproductive Medicine 2.4k
- Cancer Research 3.8k
- Genetics 6.1k
- Obstetrics and Gynecology 1.4k
Countries citing papers authored by Malcolm C. Pike
This map shows the geographic impact of Malcolm C. Pike's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Malcolm C. Pike with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Malcolm C. Pike more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Malcolm C. Pike
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Malcolm C. Pike. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Malcolm C. Pike. The network helps show where Malcolm C. Pike may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Malcolm C. Pike, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 403 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Design and analysis of randomized clinical trials requiring prolonged observation of each patient. I. Introduction and design Hit paper breakdown → | 1976 | 1610 |
| 2 | Meta-analysis of genetic association studies supports a contribution of common variants to susceptibility to common disease Hit paper breakdown → | 2003 | 1412 |
| 3 | Estrogens, Progestogens, Normal Breast Cell Proliferation, and Breast Cancer Risk Hit paper breakdown → | 1993 | 815 |
| 4 | Migration Patterns and Breast Cancer Risk in Asian-American Women Hit paper breakdown → | 1993 | 808 |
| 5 | A Multiethnic Cohort in Hawaii and Los Angeles: Baseline Characteristics Hit paper breakdown → | 2000 | 733 |
| 6 | Conservatism of the approximation sigma (O-E)2-E in the logrank test for survival data or tumor incidence data. Hit paper breakdown → | 1973 | 600 |
| 7 | Ethnic and Racial Differences in the Smoking-Related Risk of Lung Cancer Hit paper breakdown → | 2006 | 597 |
| 8 | ‘Hormonal’ risk factors, ‘breast tissue age’ and the age-incidence of breast cancer Hit paper breakdown → | 1983 | 524 |
| 9 | The role of oestrogens and progestagens in the epidemiology and prevention of breast cancer Hit paper breakdown → | 1988 | 511 |
| 10 | Endogenous hormones as a major factor in human cancer. Hit paper breakdown → | 1982 | 480 |
| 11 | 352. Note: Conservatism of the Approximation Σ(O - E) 2 /E in the Logrank Test for Survival Data or Tumor Incidence Data Hit paper breakdown → | 1973 | 447 |
| 12 | Estrogens and Endometrial Cancer in a Retirement Community Hit paper breakdown → | 1976 | 416 |
| 13 | Guidelines for simple, sensitive significance tests for carcinogenic effects in long-term animal experiments. Hit paper breakdown → | 1980 | 398 |
| 14 | 1992 | 387 | |
| 15 | 1984 | 373 | |
| 16 | 1982 | 356 | |
| 17 | Her-2/neu expression in node-negative breast cancer: direct tissue quantitation by computerized image analysis and association of overexpression with increased risk of recurrent disease. | 1993 | 354 |
| 18 | 1978 | 339 | |
| 19 | 2000 | 336 | |
| 20 | 2003 | 322 |
About Malcolm C. Pike
Malcolm C. Pike is a scholar working on Oncology, Genetics, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Reproductive Medicine and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, having authored 403 papers that have together received 33.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cancer Risks and Factors (82 papers), Estrogen and related hormone effects (58 papers), Ovarian cancer diagnosis and treatment (30 papers), Global Cancer Incidence and Screening (26 papers), Nutritional Studies and Diet (21 papers), Digital Radiography and Breast Imaging (21 papers), BRCA gene mutations in cancer (18 papers) and Testicular diseases and treatments (17 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Oncology (8.1k citations), Reproductive Medicine (2.4k citations), Cancer Research (3.8k citations), Genetics (6.1k citations) and Obstetrics and Gynecology (1.4k citations). Malcolm C. Pike has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Brian E. Henderson, Ronald K. Ross, Leslie Bernstein, John T. Casagrande, Anna H. Wu, Laurence N. Kolonel, Richard Peto, Celeste Leigh Pearce, Peter G. Smith and Darcy Spicer. Their work appears in journals such as British Journal of Cancer, JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute, The Lancet, American Journal of Epidemiology and Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.