Malcolm Booth

24 papers receiving 205 citations

Peers

Malcolm Booth
Comparison fields: 5 of 65
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine 40
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology 21
  • Radiological and Ultrasound Technology 20
  • Emergency Medicine 18
  • Clinical Biochemistry 11
Replace Vasu Gupta with:
Vasu Gupta India
Wenjuan Wu China
Andrew Dysangco United States
Ferrán Llopis Spain
Michael Collier United States
Thomas P Hellyer United Kingdom
Chiagozie I. Pickens United States
Salma Abbas Pakistan
Eric Ochoa‐Hein Mexico
Joaquin Martínez‐Montauti Spain
Malcolm Booth relative to Vasu Gupta India Vasu Gupta's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×
Vasu Gupta · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Malcolm Booth

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Malcolm Booth's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Malcolm Booth with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Malcolm Booth more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Malcolm Booth

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Malcolm Booth. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Malcolm Booth. The network helps show where Malcolm Booth may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Malcolm Booth, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Malcolm Booth Line = papers co-authored together Malcolm Booth links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 24 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201430
2 200719
3 201618
4 200916
5 201116
6 200915
7 201914
8 201614
9 201510
10 20219
11 20149
12 19988
13 20217
14 20116
15 20136
16 20095
17 20203
18 20093
19
Work-based HE pathways for the electrical power engineering industry
20122
20 20192

About Malcolm Booth

Malcolm Booth is a scholar working on Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine, General Health Professions, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health and Epidemiology, having authored 24 papers that have together received 218 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (6 papers), Nosocomial Infections in ICU (3 papers), Ethics in medical practice (3 papers), Ethics and Legal Issues in Pediatric Healthcare (3 papers), Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment (3 papers), Family and Patient Care in Intensive Care Units (3 papers), Frailty in Older Adults (3 papers) and Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine (40 citations), Geriatrics and Gerontology (21 citations), Radiological and Ultrasound Technology (20 citations), Emergency Medicine (18 citations) and Clinical Biochemistry (11 citations). Malcolm Booth has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Italy. Frequent co-authors include David Hewitt, Rachel Kearns, John Kinsella, Malcolm Daniel, Sheila A.M. McLean, Malcolm Sim, Douglas L. Young, Rachael L. Fulton, Xizhong Cui and Tara Quasim. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of the Intensive Care Society, Emerging infectious diseases, Journal of Palliative Medicine, Science and Engineering Ethics and Knowledge-Based Systems.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact