Malcolm Booth

22 papers receiving 189 citations

Peers

Malcolm Booth
Comparison fields: 5 of 70
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine 55
  • Radiological and Ultrasound Technology 34
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology 24
  • Emergency Medicine 22
  • Clinical Biochemistry 14
Replace Erika P. Plata–Menchaca with:
Erika P. Plata–Menchaca Spain
Donald Dietz United States
Thomas P Hellyer United Kingdom
Wenjuan Wu China
Aaron D. Storms United States
Kimberley M. DeMerle United States
Maria Dans United States
Valentina Morena Italy
Eric Ochoa‐Hein Mexico
Carla M. Román‐Montes Mexico
Malcolm Booth relative to Erika P. Plata–Menchaca Spain Erika P. Plata–Menchaca's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×6.7×
Erika P. Plata–Menchaca · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Malcolm Booth

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Malcolm Booth's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Malcolm Booth with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Malcolm Booth more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Malcolm Booth

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Malcolm Booth. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Malcolm Booth. The network helps show where Malcolm Booth may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Malcolm Booth, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Malcolm Booth Line = papers co-authored together Malcolm Booth links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 22 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201426
2 200718
3 201616
4 200916
5 201116
6 201614
7 201914
8 200911
9 201510
10 20149
11 20218
12 19988
13 20217
14 20116
15 20136
16 20203
17
Ethical Framework for End of Life Decisions in Intensive Care in the UK
20072
18 20092
19 20192
20 20102

About Malcolm Booth

Malcolm Booth is a scholar working on Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Surgery, Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine, General Health Professions and Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, having authored 22 papers that have together received 198 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (6 papers), Nosocomial Infections in ICU (4 papers), Ethics and Legal Issues in Pediatric Healthcare (3 papers), Ethics in medical practice (3 papers), Family and Patient Care in Intensive Care Units (3 papers), Frailty in Older Adults (3 papers), Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment (3 papers) and Emergency and Acute Care Studies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine (55 citations), Radiological and Ultrasound Technology (34 citations), Geriatrics and Gerontology (24 citations), Emergency Medicine (22 citations) and Clinical Biochemistry (14 citations). Malcolm Booth has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include David Hewitt, Rachel Kearns, Sheila A.M. McLean, John Kinsella, Andrew Smith, Malcolm Daniel, Tara Quasim, Malcolm Sim, Richard Appleton and Douglas L. Young. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of the Intensive Care Society, Emerging infectious diseases, Science and Engineering Ethics, Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association and Knowledge-Based Systems.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact