M.A.H. Smith
Impact in
- Insect Science top 2%
- Insect-Plant Interactions and Control
- Insect and Pesticide Research
- Plant Science top 5%
- Wheat and Barley Genetics and Pathology
- Genetics and Plant Breeding
- Insect Pest Control Strategies
- Weed Control and Herbicide Applications
Papers in
-
- Wheat and Barley Genetics and Pathology 19
- Genetics and Plant Breeding 9
- Weed Control and Herbicide Applications 7
- Insect Pest Control Strategies 5
-
- Insect-Plant Interactions and Control 23
- Co-authors
- R.J. Lamb (19 shared papers)I.L. Wise (22 shared papers)P.A. MacKay (6 shared papers)S. L. Fox (16 shared papers)R. I. H. McKenzie (5 shared papers)O. Olfert (2 shared papers)J. B. Thomas (6 shared papers)James R. Tucker (1 shared paper)
In The Last Decade
M.A.H. Smith
37 papers receiving 533 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 29
- Insect Science 345
- Plant Science 393
- Agronomy and Crop Science 64
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 103
- Molecular Biology 219
Countries citing papers authored by M.A.H. Smith
This map shows the geographic impact of M.A.H. Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by M.A.H. Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites M.A.H. Smith more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by M.A.H. Smith
This network shows the impact of papers produced by M.A.H. Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by M.A.H. Smith. The network helps show where M.A.H. Smith may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside M.A.H. Smith, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 38 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2000 | 42 | |
| 2 | 2002 | 38 | |
| 3 | 2000 | 38 | |
| 4 | 1989 | 31 | |
| 5 | 2001 | 31 | |
| 6 | 2010 | 29 | |
| 7 | 2003 | 27 | |
| 8 | 2001 | 27 | |
| 9 | 2012 | 24 | |
| 10 | 2004 | 24 | |
| 11 | 1993 | 22 | |
| 12 | 1990 | 22 | |
| 13 | 2014 | 18 | |
| 14 | 1989 | 18 | |
| 15 | 2009 | 18 | |
| 16 | 2009 | 15 | |
| 17 | 2009 | 14 | |
| 18 | 2007 | 14 | |
| 19 | 2013 | 13 | |
| 20 | 2011 | 11 |
About M.A.H. Smith
M.A.H. Smith is a scholar working on Plant Science, Insect Science, Molecular Biology, Agronomy and Crop Science and Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, having authored 38 papers that have together received 553 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Insect-Plant Interactions and Control (23 papers), Wheat and Barley Genetics and Pathology (19 papers), Insect Resistance and Genetics (13 papers), Genetics and Plant Breeding (9 papers), Weed Control and Herbicide Applications (7 papers), Plant and animal studies (6 papers), Agronomic Practices and Intercropping Systems (5 papers) and Insect Pest Control Strategies (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Insect Science (345 citations), Plant Science (393 citations), Agronomy and Crop Science (64 citations), Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (103 citations) and Molecular Biology (219 citations). M.A.H. Smith has collaborated with scholars based in Canada and Argentina. Frequent co-authors include R.J. Lamb, I.L. Wise, P.A. MacKay, S. L. Fox, R. I. H. McKenzie, O. Olfert, J. B. Thomas, James R. Tucker, R. M. DePauw and Robert J. Lamb. Their work appears in journals such as Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata, Oecologia, Environmental Entomology, The Canadian Entomologist and Canadian Journal of Plant Science.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.