Madlen Loebel

11 papers receiving 518 citations

Peers

Madlen Loebel
Comparison fields: 5 of 74
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 300
  • Neurology 139
  • Rehabilitation 35
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 57
  • Biological Psychiatry 7
Replace Sophie Steiner with:
Sophie Steiner Germany
Jelka Hartwig Germany
Joseph J. Melvin United States
Tim Vollmer United States
Roshan Koul Oman
Murray Flaster United States
Michelle Fabian United States
I. Krägeloh‐Mann Germany
Faruk İncecik Türkiye
M. de Baets Netherlands
Madlen Loebel relative to Sophie Steiner Germany Sophie Steiner's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.9×
Sophie Steiner · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Madlen Loebel

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Madlen Loebel's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Madlen Loebel with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Madlen Loebel more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Madlen Loebel

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Madlen Loebel. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Madlen Loebel. The network helps show where Madlen Loebel may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Madlen Loebel, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Madlen Loebel Line = papers co-authored together Madlen Loebel links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

11 of 11 papers shown
#Work
1 2015186
2 201880
3 201472
4 201754
5 202141
6 201436
7 201527
8 201525
9 20217
10
Abstract 11247: The Long Noncoding MALAT1 - MascRNA System is a Novel Regulator of Cardiac Innate Immunity
20141
11 20131

About Madlen Loebel

Madlen Loebel is a scholar working on Psychiatry and Mental health, Molecular Biology, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Physiology and Pathology and Forensic Medicine, having authored 11 papers that have together received 530 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Fibromyalgia and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Research (6 papers), Viral Infections and Immunology Research (3 papers), FOXO transcription factor regulation (2 papers), Asthma and respiratory diseases (2 papers), Systemic Sclerosis and Related Diseases (1 paper), Polyomavirus and related diseases (1 paper), Genetics, Aging, and Longevity in Model Organisms (1 paper) and Peripheral Neuropathies and Disorders (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Psychiatry and Mental health (300 citations), Neurology (139 citations), Rehabilitation (35 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (57 citations) and Biological Psychiatry (7 citations). Madlen Loebel has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United States and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Carmen Scheibenbogen, Sandra Bauer, Hans‐Dieter Volk, Patricia Grabowski, Leif G. Hanitsch, Christian Meisel, Harald Heidecke, Kirsten Wittke, Olav Mella and Øystein Fluge. Their work appears in journals such as PLoS ONE, Circulation, Circulation Heart Failure, Journal of Neuroimmunology and Brain Behavior and Immunity.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact