M Wilmoth

31 papers receiving 658 citations

Peers

M Wilmoth
Comparison fields: 5 of 79
  • Oncology 433
  • Research and Theory 11
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 138
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 140
  • General Health Professions 162
Replace Constantina Papadopoulou with:
Constantina Papadopoulou United Kingdom
Ragnhild Johanne Tveit Sekse Norway
Linda U. Krebs United States
Toril Rannestad Norway
Bibbi Thomé Sweden
Catalina Lawsin United States
Isabel White United Kingdom
Ana Fátima Carvalho Fernandes Brazil
Mina Singh Canada
Sigrunn Drageset Norway
M Wilmoth relative to Constantina Papadopoulou United Kingdom Constantina Papadopoulou's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.4×
Constantina Papadopoulou · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by M Wilmoth

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of M Wilmoth's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by M Wilmoth with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites M Wilmoth more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by M Wilmoth

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by M Wilmoth. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by M Wilmoth. The network helps show where M Wilmoth may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside M Wilmoth, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with M Wilmoth Line = papers co-authored together M Wilmoth links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 34 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2001135
2 200791
3 200469
4 200063
5 200551
6 200746
7 200637
8 201130
9 200626
10 201324
11 202121
12 201016
13
A comparison of the effects of lumpectomy versus mastectomy on sexual behaviors.
199515
14 199914
15 201411
16 19969
17 20168
18 20188
19
Development and psychometric testing of the Wilmoth Sexual Behaviors Questionnaire-Female.
20018
20 20036

About M Wilmoth

M Wilmoth is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Oncology, Sociology and Political Science, Clinical Psychology and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, having authored 34 papers that have together received 721 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cancer survivorship and care (9 papers), Family Support in Illness (8 papers), Childhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life (5 papers), Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research (4 papers), Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare (3 papers), Child Abuse and Trauma (3 papers), Migration, Health and Trauma (3 papers) and Sexual function and dysfunction studies (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Oncology (433 citations), Research and Theory (11 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (138 citations), Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (140 citations) and General Health Professions (162 citations). M Wilmoth has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Thailand and Sweden. Frequent co-authors include Carina Berterö, Elizabeth Ann Coleman, Steven C. Smith, Lorraine Tulman, Carol Beth Stewart, Nelda Samarel, Eileen G. Collins, Rebecca Rutherford Kitzmiller, Susan Shapiro and Jacek Dmochowski. Their work appears in journals such as Oncology nursing forum, Nursing Outlook, Cancer Nursing, Journal of Obstetric, Gynecologic & Neonatal Nursing and Cancer Practice.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact