M. Stokes

425 citations
27 papers · 294 · h-index 12

Impact in

Papers in

M. Stokes

25 papers receiving 257 citations

Peers

M. Stokes
Comparison fields: 5 of 75
  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine 64
  • Emergency Medical Services 40
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine 14
  • Developmental Neuroscience 11
  • Family Practice 3
Replace Henk W. van Hamersvelt with:
Henk W. van Hamersvelt Netherlands
Neda Pak Iran
Melinda Davis Canada
Aliki Martin United States
Julie Contenti France
Marie Bruyère France
Bingqing Zhang United States
Mateusz Zawadka Poland
Lon W. Keim United States
J. Nayman Australia
M. Stokes relative to Henk W. van Hamersvelt Netherlands Henk W. van Hamersvelt's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.1×
Henk W. van Hamersvelt · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by M. Stokes

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of M. Stokes's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by M. Stokes with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites M. Stokes more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by M. Stokes

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by M. Stokes. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by M. Stokes. The network helps show where M. Stokes may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside M. Stokes, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with M. Stokes Line = papers co-authored together M. Stokes links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 27 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200034
2 199631
3 201929
4 200625
5 200725
6 201823
7 201321
8 199820
9 199913
10 202312
11 199812
12 199511
13 20009
14 19966
15 19915
16 20033
17 19913
18 20003
19 19952
20 20251

About M. Stokes

M. Stokes is a scholar working on Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Physiology, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine and Surgery, having authored 27 papers that have together received 294 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes (4 papers), Airway Management and Intubation Techniques (4 papers), Anesthesia and Neurotoxicity Research (3 papers), Delphi Technique in Research (2 papers), Obstructive Sleep Apnea Research (2 papers), Central Venous Catheters and Hemodialysis (2 papers), Anesthesia and Sedative Agents (2 papers) and Tracheal and airway disorders (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (64 citations), Emergency Medical Services (40 citations), Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine (14 citations), Developmental Neuroscience (11 citations) and Family Practice (3 citations). M. Stokes has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include G. H. Tovey, Adrian Drake‐Lee, D. Jerwood, Paul A. Townsend, Oliver Bagshaw, Lijoy Varghese, Desirée Van Oorschot, Desmond Curran, Robert Pivec and Hyosung Jung. Their work appears in journals such as Anaesthesia, Pediatric Anesthesia, British Journal of Anaesthesia, European Journal of Anaesthesiology and Applied Health Economics and Health Policy.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact