M. Stokes

428 citations
28 papers · 322 · h-index 12

Impact in

Papers in

M. Stokes

26 papers receiving 282 citations

Peers

M. Stokes
Comparison fields: 5 of 76
  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine 74
  • Emergency Medical Services 44
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine 21
  • Developmental Neuroscience 15
  • Family Practice 3
Replace Henk W. van Hamersvelt with:
Henk W. van Hamersvelt Netherlands
Fred E. Shapiro United States
Gili Kadmon Israel
Ahmad Khaleghnejad Tabari Iran
Nebojsa Gojko Ladjevic Serbia
Farzaneh Motamed Iran
Andrzej Kański Poland
Carlos A. Casillas Spain
Bailin Jiang China
Nitin James Peters India
M. Stokes relative to Henk W. van Hamersvelt Netherlands Henk W. van Hamersvelt's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×2.9×
Henk W. van Hamersvelt · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by M. Stokes

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of M. Stokes's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by M. Stokes with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites M. Stokes more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by M. Stokes

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by M. Stokes. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by M. Stokes. The network helps show where M. Stokes may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside M. Stokes, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with M. Stokes Line = papers co-authored together M. Stokes links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 28 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200035
2 199633
3 201931
4 200627
5 200727
6 201825
7 201322
8 199820
9 202314
10 199913
11 199812
12 199512
13 199810
14 20009
15 19966
16 19915
17 20033
18 20003
19 20243
20 19913

About M. Stokes

M. Stokes is a scholar working on Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Developmental Neuroscience, Emergency Medical Services, Physiology and Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, having authored 28 papers that have together received 322 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Airway Management and Intubation Techniques (5 papers), Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes (4 papers), Anesthesia and Neurotoxicity Research (3 papers), Anesthesia and Sedative Agents (3 papers), Obstructive Sleep Apnea Research (2 papers), Delphi Technique in Research (2 papers), Tracheal and airway disorders (2 papers) and Neonatal Respiratory Health Research (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (74 citations), Emergency Medical Services (44 citations), Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine (21 citations), Developmental Neuroscience (15 citations) and Family Practice (3 citations). M. Stokes has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include GEOFFREY H. TOVEY, Adrian Drake‐Lee, Paul A. Townsend, David Jerwood, Oliver Bagshaw, Desmond Curran, Ashleigh A. McGirr, Michael Lee Ganz, Hyosung Jung and Carl B. Paulino. Their work appears in journals such as Anaesthesia, Pediatric Anesthesia, British Journal of Anaesthesia, European Journal of Anaesthesiology and Orthopedics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact