M. Schweda

1.2k citations
75 papers · 657 · h-index 15

Impact in

Papers in

M. Schweda

71 papers receiving 638 citations

Peers

M. Schweda
Comparison fields: 5 of 26
  • Nuclear and High Energy Physics 606
  • Statistical and Nonlinear Physics 319
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics 193
  • Mathematical Physics 74
  • Geometry and Topology 44
Replace Chanju Kim with:
Chanju Kim South Korea
H. O. Girotti Brazil
Klaus Sibold Germany
Keiji Kikkawa Japan
Б. М. Зупник Russia
L. Susskind United States
Kazutoshi Ohta Japan
José D. Edelstein Spain
Jae Hyung Yee South Korea
Miguel Angel Vázquez-Mozo Spain
M. Schweda relative to Chanju Kim South Korea Chanju Kim's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Chanju Kim · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by M. Schweda

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of M. Schweda's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by M. Schweda with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites M. Schweda more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by M. Schweda

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by M. Schweda. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by M. Schweda. The network helps show where M. Schweda may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside M. Schweda, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with M. Schweda Line = papers co-authored together M. Schweda links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 75 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201645
2 197741
3 197440
4 198035
5 197533
6 200227
7 199027
8 200327
9 198725
10 200823
11 198619
12 198718
13 200718
14 200016
15 199815
16 201014
17 200313
18 198013
19 200412
20 198912

About M. Schweda

M. Schweda is a scholar working on Nuclear and High Energy Physics, Statistical and Nonlinear Physics, Astronomy and Astrophysics, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics and Mathematical Physics, having authored 75 papers that have together received 657 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Black Holes and Theoretical Physics (52 papers), Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies (28 papers), Noncommutative and Quantum Gravity Theories (26 papers), Quantum Chromodynamics and Particle Interactions (25 papers), Cosmology and Gravitation Theories (14 papers), Quantum chaos and dynamical systems (5 papers), Physics of Superconductivity and Magnetism (4 papers) and Superconducting Materials and Applications (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Nuclear and High Energy Physics (606 citations), Statistical and Nonlinear Physics (319 citations), Astronomy and Astrophysics (193 citations), Mathematical Physics (74 citations) and Geometry and Topology (44 citations). M. Schweda has collaborated with scholars based in Austria, Switzerland and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Olivier Piguet, Wolfgang Kummer, Daniel N. Blaschke, François Gieres, Harald Grosse, Klaus Sibold, S. Ferrara, Maximilian Kreuzer, M. Reboud and Raimar Wulkenhaar. Their work appears in journals such as Physics Letters B, Nuclear Physics B, The European Physical Journal C, Journal of High Energy Physics and International Journal of Modern Physics A.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact