M. Probst
Impact in
-
- Atomic and Molecular Physics
- Quantum, superfluid, helium dynamics
- Advanced Chemical Physics Studies
- Laser-Matter Interactions and Applications
- Spectroscopy and Quantum Chemical Studies
- Spectroscopy top 10%
- Mass Spectrometry Techniques and Applications
Papers in
-
- Atomic and Molecular Physics 10
- Quantum, superfluid, helium dynamics 1
-
- Mass Spectrometry Techniques and Applications 2
- Co-authors
- P. Scheier (12 shared papers)Stephan Denifl (9 shared papers)T.D. Märk (8 shared papers)B. Farizon (1 shared paper)Gernot Hanel (1 shared paper)B. Gstir (1 shared paper)M. Farizon (1 shared paper)Eugen Illenberger (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- The Journal of Chemical Physics (5 papers)International Journal of Mass Spectrometry (3 papers)The European Physical Journal D (2 papers)The Astrophysical Journal Letters (1 paper)Physical Review Letters (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- AustriaUnited StatesUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
M. Probst
12 papers receiving 492 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 28
- Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 414
- Spectroscopy 61
- Organic Chemistry 66
- Physical and Theoretical Chemistry 11
- Computational Mechanics 13
Countries citing papers authored by M. Probst
This map shows the geographic impact of M. Probst's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by M. Probst with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites M. Probst more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by M. Probst
This network shows the impact of papers produced by M. Probst. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by M. Probst. The network helps show where M. Probst may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside M. Probst, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2003 | 305 | |
| 2 | 2013 | 56 | |
| 3 | 2011 | 33 | |
| 4 | 2007 | 30 | |
| 5 | 2003 | 28 | |
| 6 | 2009 | 14 | |
| 7 | 2010 | 14 | |
| 8 | 2008 | 10 | |
| 9 | 2010 | 9 | |
| 10 | 2009 | 5 | |
| 11 | 2003 | 3 | |
| 12 | 2012 | 1 |
About M. Probst
M. Probst is a scholar working on Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Spectroscopy, Astronomy and Astrophysics, Computational Mechanics and Organic Chemistry, having authored 12 papers that have together received 508 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Atomic and Molecular Physics (10 papers), Mass Spectrometry Techniques and Applications (2 papers), Quantum, superfluid, helium dynamics (1 paper), Ion-surface interactions and analysis (1 paper), Astrophysics and Star Formation Studies (1 paper) and Fullerene Chemistry and Applications (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (414 citations), Spectroscopy (61 citations), Organic Chemistry (66 citations), Physical and Theoretical Chemistry (11 citations) and Computational Mechanics (13 citations). M. Probst has collaborated with scholars based in Austria, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include P. Scheier, Stephan Denifl, T.D. Märk, B. Farizon, Gernot Hanel, B. Gstir, M. Farizon, Eugen Illenberger, O. Echt and Andreas Mauracher. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of Chemical Physics, International Journal of Mass Spectrometry, The European Physical Journal D, The Astrophysical Journal Letters and Physical Review Letters.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.