M. Porte

833 citations
61 papers · 610 · h-index 14

Impact in

Papers in

M. Porte

57 papers receiving 556 citations

Peers

M. Porte
Comparison fields: 5 of 72
  • Geophysics 162
  • Condensed Matter Physics 108
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 279
  • Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials 165
  • Ocean Engineering 84
Replace Patrick Shepherd with:
Patrick Shepherd
J.A. Geurst Netherlands
Philip R. Wallace Canada
Yuchuan Wei United States
Edgar R. Canavan United States
Stefanie Russ Germany
V. Grimalsky Mexico
Pascal Chauve France
Giorgio Bertotti Italy
Martin Benning United Kingdom
M. Porte relative to Patrick Shepherd Patrick Shepherd's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.8×
Patrick Shepherd · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by M. Porte

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of M. Porte's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by M. Porte with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites M. Porte more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by M. Porte

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by M. Porte. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by M. Porte. The network helps show where M. Porte may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside M. Porte, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with M. Porte Line = papers co-authored together M. Porte links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 61 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 197287
2 199345
3 197144
4
Error Analysis in Computing.
197436
5 199032
6 199129
7 199423
8 197421
9 198817
10 199617
11 199617
12 199616
13 196216
14 199213
15 198012
16 197311
17 199811
18 199710
19 199310
20 19909

About M. Porte

M. Porte is a scholar working on Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials, Materials Chemistry, Electrical and Electronic Engineering and Condensed Matter Physics, having authored 61 papers that have together received 610 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Magnetic properties of thin films (29 papers), Magnetic Properties and Applications (16 papers), Magneto-Optical Properties and Applications (15 papers), Magnetic Properties and Synthesis of Ferrites (12 papers), Magnetic Properties of Alloys (9 papers), Iron oxide chemistry and applications (5 papers), Theoretical and Computational Physics (5 papers) and Metallic Glasses and Amorphous Alloys (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Geophysics (162 citations), Condensed Matter Physics (108 citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (279 citations), Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials (165 citations) and Ocean Engineering (84 citations). M. Porte has collaborated with scholars based in France, Greece and United States. Frequent co-authors include R. Krishnan, M. Tessier, M. Ruth Lavergne, Jean Vignes, H. Lassri, R. Krishnan, G. Thomas, M. Guyot, V. Cagan and Shiva Prasad. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials, IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, Journal of Applied Physics, Geophysical Prospecting and Numerische Mathematik.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact