M. Marx

18.6k citations
153 papers · 2.2k · h-index 22

Impact in

Papers in

M. Marx

142 papers receiving 1.9k citations

Peers

M. Marx
Comparison fields: 5 of 108
  • Artificial Intelligence 1.6k
  • Computational Theory and Mathematics 441
  • Computer Networks and Communications 411
  • Signal Processing 170
  • Information Systems 320
Replace Robert L. Mercer with:
Robert L. Mercer United States
Paul B. Kantor United States
Michael Lesk United States
Wei Lu Singapore
Lucas Dixon United States
Krysta M. Svore United States
Christoph Meinel Germany
Ted Pedersen United States
Paul Tarau United States
Douglas W. Oard United States
M. Marx relative to Robert L. Mercer United States Robert L. Mercer's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.0×
Robert L. Mercer · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by M. Marx

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of M. Marx's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by M. Marx with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites M. Marx more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by M. Marx

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by M. Marx. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by M. Marx. The network helps show where M. Marx may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside M. Marx, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with M. Marx Line = papers co-authored together M. Marx links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 153 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
Using WordNet to measure semantic orientations of adjectives
2004420
2 2017141
3 200199
4
Words with attitude
200292
5 200571
6 199771
7 200458
8 201052
9 199939
10 200739
11
Definitorially complete description logics
200638
12 199935
13 200434
14 200729
15 201729
16 200827
17 202026
18 197825
19 200725
20 201522

About M. Marx

M. Marx is a scholar working on Artificial Intelligence, Computer Networks and Communications, Computational Theory and Mathematics, Information Systems and Signal Processing, having authored 153 papers that have together received 2.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Semantic Web and Ontologies (42 papers), Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge (41 papers), Advanced Database Systems and Queries (29 papers), Logic, programming, and type systems (26 papers), Topic Modeling (24 papers), Natural Language Processing Techniques (21 papers), Advanced Algebra and Logic (20 papers) and Data Management and Algorithms (14 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Artificial Intelligence (1.6k citations), Computational Theory and Mathematics (441 citations), Computer Networks and Communications (411 citations), Signal Processing (170 citations) and Information Systems (320 citations). M. Marx has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Jaap Kamps, Maarten de Rijke, Robert J. Mokken, Patrick Blackburn, Anne Schuth, Yde Venema, Carlos Areces, Balder ten Cate, Martijn Spitters and Irini Fundulaki. Their work appears in journals such as Physics Letters B, Journal of Symbolic Logic, Journal of Logic Language and Information, Journal of Logic and Computation and ACM SIGMOD Record.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact