M. M. Lees

24 papers receiving 806 citations

Peers

M. M. Lees
Comparison fields: 5 of 91
  • Reproductive Medicine 459
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 416
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 98
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 179
  • Physiology 33
Replace Christine B. Philput with:
Christine B. Philput United States
Niels H. Lauersen United States
Murray Luckas United Kingdom
H Schulman United States
M Pupkin United States
Steven Y.W. Chan Hong Kong
P.R. Hein Netherlands
R Aznar Mexico
Carlyle Crenshaw United States
Val Davajan United States
M. M. Lees relative to Christine B. Philput United States Christine B. Philput's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.3×
Christine B. Philput · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by M. M. Lees

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of M. M. Lees's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by M. M. Lees with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites M. M. Lees more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by M. M. Lees

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by M. M. Lees. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by M. M. Lees. The network helps show where M. M. Lees may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside M. M. Lees, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with M. M. Lees Line = papers co-authored together M. M. Lees links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 25 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1982180
2 1967145
3 1982145
4 198259
5 198356
6 196256
7 196929
8 198227
9 198325
10 199623
11 197019
12 197418
13 196814
14 196913
15 196911
16 19739
17 19869
18 19798
19 19776
20 19665

About M. M. Lees

M. M. Lees is a scholar working on Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Reproductive Medicine and Surgery, having authored 25 papers that have together received 867 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cardiovascular Issues in Pregnancy (5 papers), Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes (5 papers), Sperm and Testicular Function (4 papers), Reproductive Biology and Fertility (4 papers), Anesthesia and Neurotoxicity Research (3 papers), Maternal and fetal healthcare (3 papers), Hemodynamic Monitoring and Therapy (2 papers) and Pregnancy and preeclampsia studies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Reproductive Medicine (459 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (416 citations), Obstetrics and Gynecology (98 citations), Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (179 citations) and Physiology (33 citations). M. M. Lees has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include R. John Aitken, O. Djahanbakhch, Fiona S.M. Best, D. C. Richardson, D.B. SCOTT, M. G. Kerr, Allan Templeton, S. H. Taylor, David Mortimer and Alexander S. Nadas. Their work appears in journals such as BJOG An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, Fertility and Sterility, British Journal of Anaesthesia, European Journal of Clinical Investigation and Postgraduate Medical Journal.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact