M. Köppen

682 citations
32 papers · 295 · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

M. Köppen

30 papers receiving 290 citations

Peers

M. Köppen
Comparison fields: 5 of 27
  • Condensed Matter Physics 185
  • Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials 124
  • Nuclear and High Energy Physics 68
  • Catalysis 17
  • Polymers and Plastics 29
Replace J. L. Smith with:
J. L. Smith United States
W. Schneider United States
B. Moon South Korea
V. Plechác̆ek Czechia
Yasoo Harada Japan
Serena Eley United States
Denis Crété France
A. I. Mansour Canada
I. Apfelstedt Germany
M. Köppen relative to J. L. Smith United States J. L. Smith's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×6×8×9.7×
J. L. Smith · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by M. Köppen

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of M. Köppen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by M. Köppen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites M. Köppen more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by M. Köppen

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by M. Köppen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by M. Köppen. The network helps show where M. Köppen may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside M. Köppen, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with M. Köppen Line = papers co-authored together M. Köppen links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 32 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 199855
2 199944
3 199725
4 199825
5 201519
6 199618
7 201011
8 201310
9 199710
10 20009
11 20158
12 20148
13 19978
14 20105
15 20075
16 20094
17 19984
18
Influence of assembly and operation asymmetries on Wendelstein 7-X magnetic field perturbations
20134
19 19973
20 20133

About M. Köppen

M. Köppen is a scholar working on Nuclear and High Energy Physics, Condensed Matter Physics, Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials, Biomedical Engineering and Aerospace Engineering, having authored 32 papers that have together received 295 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Magnetic confinement fusion research (15 papers), Superconducting Materials and Applications (10 papers), Physics of Superconductivity and Magnetism (8 papers), Rare-earth and actinide compounds (7 papers), Particle accelerators and beam dynamics (7 papers), Iron-based superconductors research (6 papers), Ionosphere and magnetosphere dynamics (5 papers) and Advanced Condensed Matter Physics (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Condensed Matter Physics (185 citations), Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials (124 citations), Nuclear and High Energy Physics (68 citations), Catalysis (17 citations) and Polymers and Plastics (29 citations). M. Köppen has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Japan and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include F. Steglich, Michael Lang, C. Geibel, M. Weiden, A. Ochiai, R. Hauptmann, R. Helfrich, F. Schauer, Maik Lang and V. Bykov. Their work appears in journals such as Fusion Engineering and Design, Physica B Condensed Matter, Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials, Nuclear Fusion and Physical review. B, Condensed matter.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact