M. King

9.3k citations
31 papers · 1000 · h-index 16

Impact in

Papers in

M. King

28 papers receiving 971 citations

Peers

M. King
Comparison fields: 5 of 88
  • Behavioral Neuroscience 152
  • Clinical Psychology 533
  • Biological Psychiatry 54
  • Health 122
  • Developmental Neuroscience 34
Replace Vivia V. McCutcheon with:
Vivia V. McCutcheon United States
Anett Pfeiffer Germany
Julianne C. Flanagan United States
Sage E. Hawn United States
Mira Brancu United States
Andréa F. Mello Brazil
Gina M. Manguno‐Mire United States
Scott M. Hyman United States
Carla Marques‐Portella Brazil
Autumn M. Gallegos United States
M. King relative to Vivia V. McCutcheon United States Vivia V. McCutcheon's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.4×
Vivia V. McCutcheon · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by M. King

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of M. King's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by M. King with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites M. King more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by M. King

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by M. King. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by M. King. The network helps show where M. King may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside M. King, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with M. King Line = papers co-authored together M. King links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 31 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2012218
2 2016101
3 201694
4 201573
5 201860
6 201356
7 201455
8 201353
9 201552
10 201740
11 201833
12 202129
13 202029
14 201820
15 201418
16 202115
17 201711
18 201810
19 20127
20 20195

About M. King

M. King is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Sociology and Political Science, Anthropology, Behavioral Neuroscience and Religious studies, having authored 31 papers that have together received 1000 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research (10 papers), Indian and Buddhist Studies (4 papers), Chinese history and philosophy (4 papers), Child Abuse and Trauma (4 papers), Stress Responses and Cortisol (4 papers), Traumatic Brain Injury Research (3 papers), Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies (3 papers) and Intimate Partner and Family Violence (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Behavioral Neuroscience (152 citations), Clinical Psychology (533 citations), Biological Psychiatry (54 citations), Health (122 citations) and Developmental Neuroscience (34 citations). M. King has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Australia and Italy. Frequent co-authors include Patricia A. Resick, Katherine M. Iverson, Megan R. Gerber, Dawne Vogt, Amy E. Street, Shannon Wiltsey Stirman, Karen S. Mitchell, Michelle J. Bovin, Michael K. Suvak and Erika J. Wolf. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Traumatic Stress, Journal of General Internal Medicine, Behaviour Research and Therapy, Applied Psychology Health and Well-Being and Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact