M. K. Scheller

1.2k citations
20 papers · 1.1k · h-index 16

Impact in

Papers in

M. K. Scheller

20 papers receiving 1.1k citations

Peers

M. K. Scheller
Comparison fields: 5 of 56
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 675
  • Physical and Theoretical Chemistry 190
  • Spectroscopy 302
  • Inorganic Chemistry 212
  • Catalysis 72
Replace L.A. LaJohn with:
L.A. LaJohn United States
Milan Trsic Brazil
Corey J. Weinheimer United States
S. E. Barlow United States
Jean‐Louis Calais Sweden
Alain St‐Amant Canada
P.J. Brucat United States
J. G. Eaton United States
J. Barrie Peel Australia
Irene Shim Denmark
M. K. Scheller relative to L.A. LaJohn United States L.A. LaJohn's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
L.A. LaJohn · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by M. K. Scheller

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of M. K. Scheller's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by M. K. Scheller with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites M. K. Scheller more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by M. K. Scheller

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by M. K. Scheller. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by M. K. Scheller. The network helps show where M. K. Scheller may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 11 scholars most cited alongside M. K. Scheller, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with M. K. Scheller Line = papers co-authored together M. K. Scheller links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 1995357
2 1991112
3 199391
4 199271
5 199368
6 199449
7 199449
8 199546
9 199442
10 199537
11 199334
12 199630
13 199021
14 198920
15 199418
16 199018
17 199215
18 198914
19 19911
20
Success with Electronic Business: Design, Architecture and Technology of Electronic Business Systems
20001

About M. K. Scheller

M. K. Scheller is a scholar working on Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Organic Chemistry, Physical and Theoretical Chemistry, Electrical and Electronic Engineering and Spectroscopy, having authored 20 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Advanced Chemical Physics Studies (12 papers), Atomic and Molecular Physics (5 papers), Molecular Junctions and Nanostructures (5 papers), Spectroscopy and Quantum Chemical Studies (4 papers), Porphyrin and Phthalocyanine Chemistry (3 papers), Advanced Physical and Chemical Molecular Interactions (3 papers), Molecular spectroscopy and chirality (2 papers) and Organic Chemistry Cycloaddition Reactions (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (675 citations), Physical and Theoretical Chemistry (190 citations), Spectroscopy (302 citations), Inorganic Chemistry (212 citations) and Catalysis (72 citations). M. K. Scheller has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Italy and United States. Frequent co-authors include Lorenz S. Cederbaum, R. N. Compton, L. S. Cederbaum, Thomas Sommerfeld, M. Grunze, Georg Hähner, M. Kinzler, Christof Wöll, Francesco Tarantelli and Michaël S. Deleuze. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of Chemical Physics, Physical Review Letters, Chemical Physics Letters, Science and The Journal of Physical Chemistry.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact