M. J. Englefield

402 citations
22 papers · 314 · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

M. J. Englefield

20 papers receiving 287 citations

Peers

M. J. Englefield
Comparison fields: 5 of 42
  • Statistical and Nonlinear Physics 171
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 196
  • Algebra and Number Theory 25
  • Numerical Analysis 20
  • Geometry and Topology 27
Replace Luigi Solombrino with:
Luigi Solombrino Italy
A.G. Ushveridze Russia
Paul Bracken Canada
Alexander Ivanovich Zenchuk Russia
Emanuela Caliceti Italy
Nikolay A. Kostov Bulgaria
Vadim B. Kuznetsov Russia
Sandro Graffi Italy
Chris Athorne United Kingdom
Minoru Hirayama Japan
M. J. Englefield relative to Luigi Solombrino Italy Luigi Solombrino's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Luigi Solombrino · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by M. J. Englefield

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of M. J. Englefield's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by M. J. Englefield with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites M. J. Englefield more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by M. J. Englefield

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by M. J. Englefield. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by M. J. Englefield. The network helps show where M. J. Englefield may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 3 scholars most cited alongside M. J. Englefield, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with M. J. Englefield Line = papers co-authored together M. J. Englefield links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 22 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1974123
2 199035
3 198827
4 196627
5 197416
6 198714
7 198014
8 196811
9 199011
10 19879
11 19888
12 19745
13 19643
14 19723
15 19773
16 19551
17 19961
18 20061
19 19931
20
Mathematical methods for engineering and science students
19871

About M. J. Englefield

M. J. Englefield is a scholar working on Statistical and Nonlinear Physics, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Modeling and Simulation, Numerical Analysis and Geometry and Topology, having authored 22 papers that have together received 314 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Quantum chaos and dynamical systems (8 papers), Quantum Mechanics and Non-Hermitian Physics (8 papers), Nonlinear Waves and Solitons (5 papers), Matrix Theory and Algorithms (3 papers), Nonlinear Photonic Systems (2 papers), Nuclear physics research studies (2 papers), Geophysics and Sensor Technology (2 papers) and Statistical Mechanics and Entropy (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Statistical and Nonlinear Physics (171 citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (196 citations), Algebra and Number Theory (25 citations), Numerical Analysis (20 citations) and Geometry and Topology (27 citations). M. J. Englefield has collaborated with scholars based in Australia and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Lawrence C. Biedenharn, John Doyle and Ronald C. King. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications, Progress of Theoretical Physics, Mathematical and Computer Modelling, Nuclear Physics A and Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact