M. Heather Einstein

818 citations
18 papers · 648 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

M. Heather Einstein

17 papers receiving 611 citations

Peers

M. Heather Einstein
Comparison fields: 5 of 46
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 343
  • Internal Medicine 106
  • Oncology 92
  • General Health Professions 73
  • Reproductive Medicine 29
Replace Carolyn Lefkowits with:
Carolyn Lefkowits United States
Alaa Awadalla Canada
David J. Hochman Canada
Shayan M. Dioun United States
M. Hisham Al‐Sibai Saudi Arabia
Fiona Kew United Kingdom
David Allan Rittenberg Canada
Anne Louise Depla Netherlands
Mette Moustgaard Jeppesen Denmark
Marlene E Girardo United States
M. Heather Einstein relative to Carolyn Lefkowits United States Carolyn Lefkowits's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×4.3×
Carolyn Lefkowits · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by M. Heather Einstein

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of M. Heather Einstein's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by M. Heather Einstein with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites M. Heather Einstein more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by M. Heather Einstein

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by M. Heather Einstein. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by M. Heather Einstein. The network helps show where M. Heather Einstein may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside M. Heather Einstein, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with M. Heather Einstein Line = papers co-authored together M. Heather Einstein links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

18 of 18 papers shown
#Work
1 2007146
2 200892
3 200786
4 201262
5 201156
6 201244
7 200841
8 201641
9 201024
10 201123
11 201919
12 20075
13 20115
14 20111
15 20111
16 20121
17 20151
18 20080

About M. Heather Einstein

M. Heather Einstein is a scholar working on Obstetrics and Gynecology, Internal Medicine, Oncology, General Health Professions and Economics and Econometrics, having authored 18 papers that have together received 648 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Endometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments (6 papers), Venous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management (5 papers), Cancer survivorship and care (5 papers), Mobile Health and mHealth Applications (2 papers), Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare (1 paper), Uterine Myomas and Treatments (1 paper), Colorectal Cancer Surgical Treatments (1 paper) and Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Obstetrics and Gynecology (343 citations), Internal Medicine (106 citations), Oncology (92 citations), General Health Professions (73 citations) and Reproductive Medicine (29 citations). M. Heather Einstein has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Yukio Sonoda, Ellen M. Hartenbach, Nadeem R. Abu‐Rustum, S. Dennis, Richard R. Barakat, Elizabeth Anna Pritts, Kaled M. Alektiar, R.R. Barakat, N.R. Abu-Rustum and Martee Leigh Hensley. Their work appears in journals such as Gynecologic Oncology, International Journal of Gynecological Cancer, Hematology/Oncology Clinics of North America, Obstetrics and Gynecology and International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact