M. Głogowski

35 papers receiving 608 citations

Peers

M. Głogowski
Comparison fields: 5 of 88
  • Organic Chemistry 268
  • Biological Psychiatry 12
  • Pharmacology 76
  • Materials Chemistry 217
  • Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes 23
Replace H. Ohta with:
H. Ohta Japan
Yifan Zhang China
Hisao Morimoto Japan
Yuying Li China
Eirik Glimsdal Norway
Masato Nakashima Japan
James J. McNally United States
Takahiro Kitano Japan
Masaaki Matsuo Japan
M. Głogowski relative to H. Ohta Japan H. Ohta's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×6×7.6×
H. Ohta · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by M. Głogowski

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of M. Głogowski's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by M. Głogowski with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites M. Głogowski more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by M. Głogowski

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by M. Głogowski. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by M. Głogowski. The network helps show where M. Głogowski may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside M. Głogowski, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with M. Głogowski Line = papers co-authored together M. Głogowski links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 38 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2009167
2 1972106
3 197162
4 200241
5 197333
6 198128
7 198122
8 198218
9 198218
10 197416
11 201514
12 201113
13 197113
14 198011
15 199510
16 20029
17 20168
18 19686
19 19936
20 20135

About M. Głogowski

M. Głogowski is a scholar working on Organic Chemistry, Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes, Aerospace Engineering, Automotive Engineering and Computational Mechanics, having authored 38 papers that have together received 628 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Advanced Combustion Engine Technologies (8 papers), Organoboron and organosilicon chemistry (6 papers), Boron Compounds in Chemistry (5 papers), Engine and Fuel Emissions (5 papers), Luminescence and Fluorescent Materials (5 papers), Rocket and propulsion systems research (4 papers), Cyclone Separators and Fluid Dynamics (3 papers) and Technical Engine Diagnostics and Monitoring (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Organic Chemistry (268 citations), Biological Psychiatry (12 citations), Pharmacology (76 citations), Materials Chemistry (217 citations) and Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes (23 citations). M. Głogowski has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Poland and Canada. Frequent co-authors include J. L. R. Williams, Patrick J. Grisdale, Gustavo Dziewczapolski, Stephen F. Heinemann, J. C. Doty, Michael M. Micci, Thomas H. Regan, H. K. Hall, Nicholas Zumbulyadis and B. Dolenko. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Organometallic Chemistry, The Journal of Organic Chemistry, Journal of Propulsion and Power, Journal of Molecular and Cellular Cardiology and NMR in Biomedicine.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact