M. Frederick

526 citations
9 papers · 420 · h-index 6

Impact in

Papers in

M. Frederick

9 papers receiving 372 citations

Peers

M. Frederick
Comparison fields: 5 of 68
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 174
  • Applied Psychology 22
  • General Health Professions 90
  • Clinical Psychology 74
  • Epidemiology 110
Replace Nancy Amodei with:
Nancy Amodei United States
Martin H. Young United States
Anna-Kristin Brettschneider Germany
Ana Paula Muraro Brazil
C G Olsen United States
Theresa Skybo United States
Evangeline Danseco Canada
Lauren Bruce Australia
Autumn Lanoye United States
Grazia Isabella Continisio Italy
M. Frederick relative to Nancy Amodei United States Nancy Amodei's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.7×
Nancy Amodei · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by M. Frederick

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of M. Frederick's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by M. Frederick with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites M. Frederick more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by M. Frederick

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by M. Frederick. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by M. Frederick. The network helps show where M. Frederick may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside M. Frederick, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with M. Frederick Line = papers co-authored together M. Frederick links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

9 of 9 papers shown
#Work
1 1994177
2 1994152
3
Risk behaviors of persons with heterosexually acquired HIV infection in the United States: results of a multistate surveillance project.
199429
4 200724
5 199221
6
Clinicopathological study of exfoliative dermatitis.
200810
7 20045
8
Goltz Syndrome (Focal Dermal Hypoplasia)
20051
9 20051

About M. Frederick

M. Frederick is a scholar working on Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Epidemiology, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Obstetrics and Gynecology and Infectious Diseases, having authored 9 papers that have together received 420 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Reproductive Health and Contraception (2 papers), Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions (2 papers), Body Composition Measurement Techniques (1 paper), Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet (1 paper), Genetic and rare skin diseases. (1 paper), Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes (1 paper), Dermatology and Skin Diseases (1 paper) and Ectopic Pregnancy Diagnosis and Management (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (174 citations), Applied Psychology (22 citations), General Health Professions (90 citations), Clinical Psychology (74 citations) and Epidemiology (110 citations). M. Frederick has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Hungary and Pakistan. Frequent co-authors include Eva Obarzanek, Edward Lakatos, Adam Atherly, Thomas M. Wickizer, Thomas D. Koepsell, Kenneth Stark, Charles Maynard, Antoinette Krupski, Carolyn Westhoff and Kurt T. Barnhart. Their work appears in journals such as Fertility and Sterility, American Journal of Public Health, American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics and Circulation.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact