M. Forker

102 papers receiving 1.1k citations

Peers

M. Forker
Comparison fields: 5 of 50
  • Condensed Matter Physics 605
  • Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials 343
  • Nuclear and High Energy Physics 193
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 384
  • Radiation 87
Replace Stephen S. Rosenblum with:
Stephen S. Rosenblum United States
J. O. Thomson United States
R. Keitel Canada
Masaaki Kontani Japan
Michel Rots Belgium
Torben Otto Brun United States
T. Hihara Japan
Uzi Atzmony Israel
G. Kaindl Germany
E. J. Ansaldo Canada
M. Forker relative to Stephen S. Rosenblum United States Stephen S. Rosenblum's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×6×7.8×
Stephen S. Rosenblum · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by M. Forker

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of M. Forker's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by M. Forker with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites M. Forker more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by M. Forker

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by M. Forker. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by M. Forker. The network helps show where M. Forker may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside M. Forker, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with M. Forker Line = papers co-authored together M. Forker links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 105 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 197364
2 200256
3 200339
4 198536
5 200834
6 197932
7 200525
8 197325
9 200022
10 197321
11 197321
12 197621
13 198020
14 197319
15 196919
16 199419
17 197919
18 197418
19 198017
20 198317

About M. Forker

M. Forker is a scholar working on Condensed Matter Physics, Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials, Nuclear and High Energy Physics, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics and Materials Chemistry, having authored 105 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Rare-earth and actinide compounds (63 papers), Magnetic Properties of Alloys (31 papers), Nuclear physics research studies (19 papers), Advanced Chemical Physics Studies (13 papers), Magnetic properties of thin films (11 papers), Hydrogen Storage and Materials (9 papers), Nuclear Physics and Applications (8 papers) and Solid-state spectroscopy and crystallography (8 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Condensed Matter Physics (605 citations), Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials (343 citations), Nuclear and High Energy Physics (193 citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (384 citations) and Radiation (87 citations). M. Forker has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Brazil and Argentina. Frequent co-authors include Patricia de la Presa, Hermann Wagner, A. F. Pasquevich, B. Perscheid, S. Müller, Daniel Navia Simon, Dorothée Vinga Szabó, Sven Scholz, L. A. Errico and K. Krien. Their work appears in journals such as Physical Review B, The European Physical Journal B, The European Physical Journal A, Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials and Journal of Physics Condensed Matter.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact