M. Fleischer

11 papers receiving 297 citations

Peers

M. Fleischer
Comparison fields: 5 of 68
  • Geophysics 218
  • Geology 43
  • Chemical Health and Safety 4
  • Earth-Surface Processes 23
  • Atmospheric Science 45
Replace Keiichi Shiraki with:
Keiichi Shiraki Japan
Chaoyang Li China
Adam J. Jeffery United Kingdom
Borja Antolín Germany
A. Boriani Italy
S. Kachovich Australia
R. J. Bultitude Australia
Jinquan Dong China
P Erdmer Canada
Jiangyu Zhou China
M. Fleischer relative to Keiichi Shiraki Japan Keiichi Shiraki's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×15×21×
Keiichi Shiraki · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by M. Fleischer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of M. Fleischer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by M. Fleischer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites M. Fleischer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by M. Fleischer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by M. Fleischer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by M. Fleischer. The network helps show where M. Fleischer may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 11 scholars most cited alongside M. Fleischer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with M. Fleischer Line = papers co-authored together M. Fleischer links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

19 of 19 papers shown
#Work
1 2006238
2
Testing Costs and Testing Capacity According to the REACH Requirements - Results of a Survey of Independent and Corporate GLP Laboratories in the EU and Switzerland
200732
3 200514
4 19995
5 20035
6 20104
7 19814
8 19893
9 19882
10 20122
11 19702
12 19691
13 19781
14 19761
15
Organising Product Stewardship in Large Chemical Companies
20050
16 20020
17 19880
18 19640
19 19870

About M. Fleischer

M. Fleischer is a scholar working on Political Science and International Relations, Computational Mechanics, Organic Chemistry, Strategy and Management and Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, having authored 19 papers that have together received 314 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ion-surface interactions and analysis (3 papers), Innovation Policy and R&D (2 papers), Atomic and Molecular Physics (2 papers), Fullerene Chemistry and Applications (2 papers), Diamond and Carbon-based Materials Research (2 papers), Reformation and Early Modern Christianity (2 papers), Intellectual Property and Patents (1 paper) and European Political History Analysis (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Geophysics (218 citations), Geology (43 citations), Chemical Health and Safety (4 citations), Earth-Surface Processes (23 citations) and Atmospheric Science (45 citations). M. Fleischer has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Germany and Israel. Frequent co-authors include Richard Gloaguen, Lothar Ratschbacher, Raymond Jonckheere, Yongqian Zhang, B. Hacker, Eva Enkelmann, Yongsheng Ma, B. Tsipinyuk, E. Kolodney and A. Kaplan. Their work appears in journals such as Church History, Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section B Beam Interactions with Materials and Atoms, Sixteenth Century Journal, The American Historical Review and Archiv für Reformationsgeschichte - Archive for Reformation History.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact